Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6125 Raj
Judgement Date : 19 August, 2023
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 933/2023
1. Jhala Ram S/o Sh. Ukaji, Aged About 50 Years, Meda Uparla, P.s. Bagra, Dist. Jalore. (Presently Lodged In Dist. Jail, Jalore).
2. Khasa Ram S/o Sh. Ukaji, Aged About 56 Years, Meda Uparla, P.s. Bagra, Dist. Jalore. (Presently Lodged In Dist. Jail, Jalore).
3. Vasna Ram S/o Sh. Khasa Ram, Aged About 26 Years, Meda Uparla, P.s. Bagra, Dist. Jalore. (Presently Lodged In Dist. Jail, Jalore).
4. Suja Ram S/o Sh. Bala Ram, Aged About 38 Years, Meda Uparla, P.s. Bagra, Dist. Jalore. (Presently Lodged In Dist. Jail, Jalore).
5. Teja Ram S/o Sh. Vaja Ram, Aged About 25 Years, Meda Uparla, P.s. Bagra, Dist. Jalore. (Presently Lodged In Dist. Jail, Jalore).
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Arora
For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Bhati, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
19/08/2023
1. The instant application for suspension of sentence has been
moved on behalf of the applicants in the matter of judgment dated
04.08.2023 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge,
Jalore in Sessions Case No.131/2021 whereby they were convicted
and sentenced to suffer maximum imprisonment of seven years'
simple imprisonment along with a fine of Rs.2,000/- under Section
452 of IPC as well as under Section 325/149 of IPC and lesser
(2 of 3) [SOSA-933/2023]
punishment for the other offences under Sections 148 and
323/149 of IPC.
2. It is contended on behalf of the applicant that the learned
trial Judge has not appreciated the correct, legal and factual
aspects of the matter and thus, reached at an erroneous
conclusion of guilt, therefore, the same is required to be
appreciated again by this court being the first appellate Court.
Hearing of the appeal is likely to take long time, therefore, the
application for suspension of sentence may be granted.
3. Per contra, learned public prosecutor has vehemently
opposed the prayer made on behalf of the accused-applicant for
releasing the appellant on application for suspension of sentence.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
material available on record.
5. Section 325 of IPC prescribes seven years maximum
imprisonment which has been awarded in this case to the
appellants. A perusal of the order of sentence dated 04.08.2023
revealing that no satisfactory explanation or reasoning has been
given as to why the maximum punishment should be awarded,
thus, this Court deems it appropriate to interfere in this matter.
6. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the
parties and looking to the totality of facts and circumstances of
the case, the hearing of appeal is likely to take further more time
and considering the overall submissions while refraining from
passing any comments on the niceties of the matter and the
defects of the prosecution as the same may put an adverse effect
(3 of 3) [SOSA-933/2023]
on hearing of the appeal, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit
case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused-
appellants.
7. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed
under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the
sentence passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalore who
passed the impugned order dated 04.08.2023 in Sessions Case
No. 131/2021 against the appellant-applicants- Jhala Ram S/o
Sh. Ukaji, Khasa Ram S/o Sh. Ukaji, Vasna Ram S/o Sh.
Khasa Ram, Suja Ram S/o Sh. Bala Ram and Teja Ram S/o
Sh. Vaja Ram shall remain suspended till final disposal of the
aforesaid appeal and they shall be released on bail provided each
of them execute a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-with
two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned
trial Judge for their appearance in this court on 19.09.2023 and
whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the
conditions indicated below:-
(1) That they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.
(2) That if the applicants change the place of residence, they will give in writing their changed addresses to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.
(3) Similarly, if the sureties change their addresses, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.
(FARJAND ALI),J 45-divya/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!