Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anil Kumawat vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 5800 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5800 Raj
Judgement Date : 11 August, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Anil Kumawat vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 11 August, 2023
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
[2023:RJ-JD:25579]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11154/2023

1.       Anil Kumawat S/o Sita Ram Kumawat, Aged About 20
         Years, R/o Badiwalo Ki Dhani, Rojadi, Tehsil Phulera,
         Jaipur.
2.       Manish Gurjar S/o Shish Ram Gurjar, Aged About 19
         Years, R/o 148 Shri Ram Nagar Vistar, Jhotwara, Jaipur.
3.       Ram Kalyan Jangir S/o Rajesh Kumar Jangir, Aged About
         19 Years, R/o Sundar Nagar, Ward No. 1 Chaksu, Jaipur.
4.       Ranveer Dudi S/o Om Prakash Choudhary, Aged About 20
         Years, R/o Dudiyo Ki Dhani, Matyawas, Tehsil Phulera,
         Jaipur.
5.       Vijay Khorwal S/o Raju Lal Khorwal, Aged About 19 Years,
         R/o Barna, Regar Mohalla, Tehsil Kishangarh, Ajmer.
6.       Manish Kumawat S/o Ramesh Chand Kumawat, Aged
         About 20 Years, R/o Mannapura, Khediram, Akoda, Tehsil
         Phulera, District Jaipur.
                                                                    ----Petitioners
                                     Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Animal
         And Husbandry Department, Jaipur.
2.       Coordinator, Rajasthan University And Veterinary And
         Animal Science, Bikaner.
3.       Controller   Of    Examinations,           Rajasthan      University   Of
         Veterinary And Animal Science, Bikaner.
4.       Registrar, Rajasthan University Of Veterinary And Animal
         Science, Bikaner.
5.       Subhash College Of Animal Husbandry, Gajsinghpura,
         Opposite Power House, Ajmer Road, Jaipur.
                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)           :    Mr. RJ Punia
For Respondent(s)           :



      HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                      Order


                      (Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 04:14:19 AM)
 [2023:RJ-JD:25579]                        (2 of 4)                         [CW-11154/2023]


11/08/2023

1.     The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition

claiming the following reliefs :-
    ""It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that
     this writ petition may kindly be allowed and by an
     appropriate writ, order or direction:-
     i) That the respondent no.2 may kindly be directed to give
     admission / enrolment to the petitioners in the AHDP Course
     in session 2022-23.
     ii) That the admission by the institution on the vacant seat
     may be validated in the AHDP Course in session 2022-23.
     iii) Any other relief/reliefs, which this Hon'ble Court may
     deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the
     case, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners in
     the interest of justice.
     iv) Costs of the writ petition may kindly be awarded in
     favour of the petitioners.""

2.     Learned        counsel     for     the     petitioner          submits   that   the

controversy involved in the present matter is squarely covered by

the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Aasuddeen &

Ors.        Vs    State    of    Rajasthan            (S.B.Civil         Writ   Petition

No.8677/2023), decided along with the other connected matters

on 10.08.2023 and seeks similar directions for the present

petitioners also; the relevant                  portion of the order reads as

under:-


       "7.       Heard learned counsel for the parties as well as
       perused the record of the case.
       8.        This Court observes that the issue involved in the
       all instant petitions is common. The respondents issued
       an advertisement for admission in the Course in
       question, whereafter, two rounds of counselling were
       conducted. After such process, the Colleges gave
       admissions to the students under the State quota

                          (Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 04:14:19 AM)
 [2023:RJ-JD:25579]                      (3 of 4)                          [CW-11154/2023]


     without any written permission. The Colleges also sent
     the list of those students to the respondent, but the
     respondent enrolled only those students who were
     admitted        through     counselling,         and     not    to     those
     students who were given admission beyond prescribed
     limit/quota.
     9.     This Court further observes that 85% seats were
     to be filled against the State quota through counselling
     only, while the remaining 15%                     management quota
     seats were to be filled by the concerned Colleges, and
     therefore,      once    the     allocation       of     the    seats      was
     prescribed, the Colleges cannot breach such quota
     without any prior permission.
     10.    This Court also observes that after two rounds of
     counselling pertaining to the Course in question, still
     the seats are lying vacant under the State quota; the
     Colleges itself started giving admissions to the students
     in the Course in question without any communication
     or any permission of the respondent-University.
     11.    This Court further observes that the Office of the
     Registrar,      Rajasthan       University        of    Veterinary        And
     Animal Sciences, Bikaner vide letter dated 02.05.2023
     directed     the    Principal(s)       of     the      concerned       AHDP
     Institute(s) affiliated to the respondent-University not
     to give admission to any student under the State quota
     in the Course in question, beyond the prescribed limit/
     quota, with the stipulation that, "if any ADHP institute
     is found involved in making such admissions, they will
     be fully responsible for this act.".
     12.    In the present adjudication, this Court has also
     kept into consideration the fact that on an earlier
     occasion also, one time relaxation has been granted by
     the   respondents,         in   grant       of   admissions          by   the
     institutions in the 85% Quota of State beyond the
     State counselling.


                        (Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 04:14:19 AM)
                                    [2023:RJ-JD:25579]                     (4 of 4)                             [CW-11154/2023]


                                        13.    In view of the above, it is directed that in case
                                        the respondents conduct any further counselling, as
                                        per the policy, within 60 days from today, and after
                                        such counselling, any seat(s), under the State quota of
                                        85% and Management quota of 15%, is found vacant,
                                        the respondents shall consider the candidature of the
                                        petitioners (students), against such vacant seat(s),
                                        strictly in accordance with law.              It is made clear that
                                        the respondents shall be free to initiate any lawful
                                        action against the petitioners (Colleges) for grant of
                                        illegal    admissions,       if    so     warranted.           Until     such
                                        consideration and consequent permission is granted by
                                        the respondents, no student shall have a right to
                                        pursue the Course and their admissions will remain null
                                        and void (illegal.).
                                        14.    The      present      petitions        stand           disposed      of
                                        accordingly.      All   pending         applications           also     stand
                                        disposed of.       "



                                   3.    In light of the aforequoted judgment, the present petition is

                                   also disposed of in the same terms. All pending applications also

                                   stand disposed of.


                                                                   (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

68-Sudheer/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter