Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jagdish Prasad Sharma S/O Late ... vs Naveen Jain (2023:Rj-Jp:19769)
2023 Latest Caselaw 4383 Raj/2

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4383 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 29 August, 2023

Rajasthan High Court
Jagdish Prasad Sharma S/O Late ... vs Naveen Jain (2023:Rj-Jp:19769) on 29 August, 2023
Bench: Mahendar Kumar Goyal
[2023:RJ-JP:19769]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

               S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 544/2020

                                            In

                     S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7554/2019

Jagdish Prasad Sharma S/o Late Shri Chote Lal Sharma, Aged
About 66 Years, Resident Of 83, Gomti Sadan Ramnagar Colony,
Behind Munshi T.c.m. Stadium, District Karuali.
                                                                        ----Petitioner
                                        Versus
1.       Naveen        Jain,   The      Chairman,         Rajasthan     State   Road
         Transport Corporation, Chomu House, Parivahan Marg,
         Jaipur.
2.       Naveen Jain, Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road
         Transport Corporation Chomu House, Parihavan Marg,
         Jaipur.
3.       Vishnu Kumar, Chief Manger, Rsrtc, Hindaun Depot,
         Hindaun City District Karauli.
                                                                     ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitesh Kumar Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Om Prakash Sheoran

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

Judgment / Order

29/08/2023

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that barring the

interest component/allowances, he has been paid all of his dues.

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the

petitioners shall be paid interest/allowances as per his priority in

view of Circulars of the RSRTC dated 03.11.2021 & 17.05.2022.

[2023:RJ-JP:19769] (2 of 2) [CCP-544/2020]

Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection if the

payment of interest/allowances is made to him as per his priority

in view of the aforesaid Circulars.

In view thereof, this contempt petition is disposed of.

However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to get the contempt

petition revived if the priority is breached by the respondents.

The notices are discharged.

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

Manish/61

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter