Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3670 Raj
Judgement Date : 26 April, 2023
[2023/RJJD/012026]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3794/2017
1. Bhopal Singh S/o Ratan Singh, Belt No. 852, Village Dudapura, Post Ghanerav, Tehsil Desuri, District Pali, Rajasthan.
2. Bhagwat Singh S/o Bhanwar Singh, Belt No. 825, Village Piparda, Tehsil Rajsamand, District Rajsamand, Rajasthan.
3. Rishpal Singh S/o Nirbhay Singh, Belt No. 841, Village Dudhpura, Post Bamenherda, Tehsil Nathdwara, District Rajsamand, Rajasthan
4. Sohan Singh S/o Ghambir Singh Chundawat, Belt No No. 831, Village Parawal, Post Bangol, Tehsil Nathdwara, District Rajsamand, Rajasthan.
5. Sanjiv Kumar S/o Ramdayal Ji, Belt No. 830, Village Tanwarpura, Post Gordhanpura, Tehsil Kot Putali, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
6. Jaideep Singh S/o Mohabat Singh, Belt No. 827, Village Bhilwara, Tehsil Charbhuja, District Rajsamand, Rajasthan.
7. Yashpal Singh S/o Dungar Singh, Belt No. 844, Village Kotela, Post Bangol, Tehsil Nathdwara, District Rajsamand, Rajasthan.
8. Laxmilal S/o Pyarechand Ji, Belt No. 829, Village Dhaneryagarh, Tehsil Relmangara, District Rajsamand, Rajasthan.
9. Ranjeet Singh S/o Ratan Singh Rathore, Belt No. 839, Village Vishanpura, Tehsil Mavli, District Udaipur, Rajasthan.
10. Ramesh Chandra S/o Sunder Lal Joshi, Belt No. 846, Village Devikawas, Tehsil Kumbalgarh, District Udaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Financial Advisor, Police Headquarter, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. The Inspector General Of Police, Udaipur Range, Rajasthan.
5. The Superintendent Of Police, Rajsamand, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
[2023/RJJD/012026] (2 of 3) [CW-3794/2017]
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanwar Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anil Bissa
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
26/04/2023
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners aggrieved
against the order dated 10.01.2017 (Annex.13) passed by the
respondents, whereby the representation made by the petitioners
pursuant to the order dated 11.11.2016 passed in S.B. Civil Writ
Petition No. 8318/2016 has been rejected.
2. It is inter alia submitted by learned counsel for the
petitioners that the Division Bench judgment of this Court in State
of Rajasthan V. Banne Khan : S.A.W. No. 763/2011 decided on
02.08.2011 could not be brought to the notice of the respondents
while deciding the representation dated 10.01.2017 (Annex.13)
and once the said judgment was brought to the notice of the
respondents, persons similarly situated to the petitioners have
been granted the relief as sought in the present writ petition by
order dated 01.08.2016 (Annex.15) and therefore, a prayer has
been made that the respondents may be directed to reconsider
the case of the petitioners in light of the judgment in the case of
Banne Khan (supra).
3. In view of the above submissions made by the learned
counsel for the respondents, the writ petition filed by the
petitioners is disposed of requiring the petitioners to submit a
copy of the present writ petition alongwith a copy of this order to
the appropriate authority. The appropriate authority is directed to
[2023/RJJD/012026] (3 of 3) [CW-3794/2017]
consider and deal with the petitioners' grievances by reasoned
speaking order within a period of eight weeks from the date of
submission of this order. It is made clear that even thereafter
petitioners' grievance survives, they will be at liberty to take
recourse to appropriate proceedings.
4. All the interlocutory application(s) including the stay
application stand disposed of.
(DINESH MEHTA),J 22-pooja/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!