Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ratana vs State Of Rajasthan
2023 Latest Caselaw 3401 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3401 Raj
Judgement Date : 21 April, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Ratana vs State Of Rajasthan on 21 April, 2023
Bench: Farjand Ali

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.312/2021

In

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1016/2021

Ratana S/o Sh. Nathiya Adiwasi, Aged About 50 Years, Village Jhantala Nawa Tapra P.s. Sadar Banswara, Dist. Banswara (Raj.).

                                                                  ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
                                                                ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)        :     Mr. S.S. Rathore
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. Gaurav Singh, P.P.



             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

                                    Order

21/04/2023


1. The instant application for suspension of sentence has been

moved on behalf of the applicant in the matter of judgment dated

16.11.2006 passed by the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate,

Banswara in Criminal Regular Case No.186/2006 whereby he was

convicted and sentenced to suffer maximum imprisonment of one

year's rigorous imprisonment along with a fine of Rs.50/- under

Sections 457 and 380 of IPC.

2. It is contended on behalf of the applicant that why the

petitioner was not entitled to get the benefit of probation, has not

been considered. The petitioner's indulgence in any other criminal

case has not been reported either in the judgment of trial Court or

in the appellate Court. He further submits that the learned trial

(2 of 3) [SOSR-312/2021]

Judge has not appreciated the correct, legal and factual aspects of

the matter and thus, reached at an erroneous conclusion of guilt,

therefore, the same is required to be appreciated again by this

court. He was on bail during trial and appeal and did not misuse

the liberty so granted to him; hearing of the revision is likely to

take long time, therefore, the application for suspension of

sentence may be granted.

3. Per contra, learned public prosecutor has vehemently

opposed the prayer made on behalf of the accused-applicant for

releasing the petitioner on application for suspension of sentence.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

material available on record.

5. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the

parties and looking to the totality of facts and circumstances of

the case, more particularly the facts that the accused-petitioner

was on bail during the course of trial and the hearing of revision is

likely to take further more time and considering the overall

submissions while refraining from passing any comments on the

niceties of the matter and the defects of the prosecution as the

same may put an adverse effect on hearing of the revision, this

court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the

sentence awarded to the accused-petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the

sentence passed by learned Additional Judicial Magistrate,

Banswara who passed the impugned order dated 16.11.2006 in

(3 of 3) [SOSR-312/2021]

Criminal Regular Case No.186/2006 against the petitioner-

applicant- Ratana S/o Sh. Nathiya Adiwasi shall remain

suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid revision and he shall

be released on bail provided he executes a personal bond in the

sum of Rs.50,000/-with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this

court on 23.05.2023 and whenever ordered to do so till the

disposal of the revision on the conditions indicated below:-

(1) That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

(2) That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

(3) Similarly, if the sureties change their addresses, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

(FARJAND ALI),J 7-divya/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter