Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11416 Raj
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2022
(1 of 8) [CW-5319/2011]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5319/2011 Gajanand S/o Sh. Kishan lal Ji Agarwal, aged about 48 years, B/c Agarwal, R/o Roop Bagh Colony, Sheoganj, District Sirohi.
----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, through the Secretary, Local Self Government, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Municipal Board, Sheoganj through its Executive Officer, Sheoganj, District Sirohi.
----Respondents Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3675/2008 Rajesh Kumar Soni S/o Shri Roop Chand Soni, Aged about 32 years, R/o Moti Chowk, Sheoganj, District Sirohi.
----Petitioner Versus
1. The Municipal Board, Sheoganj, District Sirohi, through the Executive Officer.
2. The Executive Officer, Municipal Board, Sheoganj, District Sirohi.
3. The State of Rajasthan through the Secretary, Department of Local Self Government, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9504/2009 Prem Chand S/o Bhanwar Lal B/c Prajapat aged about 42 years, R/o Mohalla Duliyabas, Sujangarh, District Churu.
----Petitioner Versus Municipal Board, Sujangarh, District Churu through its Executive Officer.
----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9505/2009 Smt. Manjulata W/o Pritam Lal B/c Prajapat age about 43 years
(2 of 8) [CW-5319/2011]
R/o Mohalla Duliyabas, Sujangarh, District Churu; throught her power of attorney-holder Shri Prem Chand S/o Byhanwar Lal B/c Prajapat age about 42 years R/o Mohalla Duliyabas, Sujangarh, District Churu.
----Petitioner Versus Municipal Board, Sujangarh, District Churu through its Executive Officer.
----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9506/2009
1. Pritam Lal S/o Bhanwar Lal Prajapat aged about 45 years.
2. Munna Lal S/o Bhanwar Lal Prajapat, aged about 39 years. Both B/c Prajapat R/o Ward No. 27, Sujangarh, District Churu; through their power of attorney-holder Prem Chand S/o Bhanwar Lal Prajapat aged about 42 years, R/o Mohalla Duliyabas, Sujangarh, District Churu.
----Petitioners Versus Municipal Board, Sujangarh, District Churu, through its Executive Officer.
----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 732/2010 Bajranglal Kathotia S/o Late Shri Bhanwerlal Kathatia, aged about 67 years, B/c Oswal, Karta, HUF Bajaranglal Kathatia, R/o Ward No. 24, Kasba Sujangarh, District Churu through power of attorney holder Shri Anand Kumar Kathotia S/o Shri B.L. kathotia, aged about 56 years, B/c Oswal, R/o 104 China Bazaar street, Calcutta.
----Petitioner Versus Municipal Board, Sujangarh, District Churu, through its Executive Officer.
----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5710/2010 Nathulal Chunilal HUF through its Karta Shiv Kumar Agarwal S/o Shri Nathu Lal Agarwal, aged about 40 years, R/o A-5 Adarsh Colony, Sumerpur, District Pali
----Petitioner
(3 of 8) [CW-5319/2011]
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, through the Secretary, Local Self Government, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Municipal Board, Sheoganj, District Sirohi.
3. The Executive Officer, Municipal Board, Sheoganj, District Sirohi.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5711/2010 Kanu Devi W/o Late Sh. Nathulal Agarwal, Aged about 81 years, R/o A-5, Adarsh Colony, Sumerpur, District Pali.
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, through the Secretary, Local Self Government, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Municipal Board, Sheoganj, District Sirohi.
3. The Executive Officer, Municipal Board, Sheoganj, District Sirohi.
----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6809/2010 Smt. Kamla D/o Shri P.C. Jain, aged about 70 years, R/o Roopbagh Colony, Sheoganj, District Sirohi
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, through the Director, Local Self Government, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Municipal Board, Sheoganj, through Executive Officer District Sirohi.
3. The Executive Officer, Municipal Board, Sheoganj, District Sirohi.
----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10001/2010 Chandra Prakash Jain S/o Shri Nainmal Jain, B/c Oswal, R/o Inside Tilak Dwar, Jalore.
----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, through the Director, Local Self Government, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Municipal Board, Jalore, through Executing Officer.
(4 of 8) [CW-5319/2011]
3. The Executive Officer, Municipal Board Jalore.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11502/2010 Khimraj Soni S/o Shri Devkishan, B/c Soni, aged about 33 years, R/o Chhipa Bas, Sheoganj, District Sirohi.
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, through the Director, Local Self Government, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Municipal Board, Sheoganj, through Executive Officer District Sirohi.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1154/2011
1. Bhupendra Goyal S/o Shri Ramcharan, B/c Goyal Aged about 38 years, R/o Shivganj, District Sirohi.
2. Ankit Kumar S/o Shri Satyanarayan Agarwal, aged about 27 years, B/c Agarwal, R/o Shivganj, District Sirohi.
3. Kishan Lal S/o Shri Jiyalal Soni, Aged about 44 years, B/c Soni, R/o Shivganj, District Sirohi.
4. Pukhraj S/o Shri Jiyalal Soni, Age about 44 years, B/c Soni, R/ o Shivganj, District Sirohi.
5.Smt. Nirun Goyal W/o Shri Bhupendra Goyal, Aged about 36 years, B/c Goyal, R/o Shivganj, District Sirohi.
6. Smt. Kailash Devi W/o Shri Rajendra Kumar Soni, Aged about 28 years, B/c Soni R/o Shivganj, District Sirohi.
7. Smt. Lata Devi Soni W/o Rajendra Kumar Soni, Aged about 28 years, B/c Soni, R/o Shivganj, District Sirohi.
----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, through the Director, Local Self Government, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Municipal Board, Sheoganj, through Executive Officer District Sirohi.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5180/2011 Ramchandra Maratha S/o Shri Jagnathji, aged about 54 years, B/ c Maratha, R/o Jatio ka Vas, Sheoganj.
(5 of 8) [CW-5319/2011]
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, through the Director, Local Self
Government, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Municipal Board, Sheoganj, through Executive Officer District Sirohi.
3. The Executive Officer, Municipal Board, Sheoganj, District Sirohi.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7631/2011 Nemi Chand S/o Shri Pukhraj, B/c Khandelwal, aged about 42 years, R/o Near Jhalaravav, Sirohi, District Sirohi.
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, through the Director, Local Self Government, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Municipal Board, Sheoganj, through Executive Officer District Sirohi.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12522/2011 Dharma Ram S/o Shri Bhubaji Kumhar, B/c Kumhar, Aged about 55 years, R/o Sabji mandi, Sheoganj, District Sirohi.
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, through the Director, Local Self Government, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Municipal Board, Sheoganj, through Executive Officer District Sirohi.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 528/2012 Madan Lal adopted S/o Shri Kistur Chand Ji, B/c Agarwal, aged about 50 years, R/o Agresen Marg, Sheoganj, District Sirohi (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
Municipal Board, Sheoganj through its Executive Officer,
(6 of 8) [CW-5319/2011]
Municipal Board, Sheoganj (Sirohi).
----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1094/2012
1. Smt. Raj Agarwal W/o Shri Bajranglal, B/c Agarwal, aged about 55 years, R/o Behind Tanga Stand, Sheoganj, District Sirohi.
2. Sandeep Agarwal S/o Shri Bajranglal, B/c Agarwal, aged about 31 years, R/o Behind Tanga Stand, Sheoganj, District Sirohi.
3. Shailesh Agarwal S/o Shri Bajranglal, B/c Agarwal, Aged about 29 years, R/o Behind Tanga Stand, Sheoganj, District Sirohi.
----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, through the Director, Local Self Government, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Municipal Board, Sheoganj, through Executive Officer District Sirohi.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1095/2012
1. Bhagwan Das S/o Shri Hastimal, B/c Soni, Aged about 58 years, R/o Holi chowk, Sheoganj, District Sirohi.
2. Manohar lal S/o Shri Hastimal, B/c Soni, Aged about 55 years, R/o Holi Chowk, Sheoganj, District Sirohi.
3. Hemraj S/o Shri Hastimal B/c Soni, Aged about 53 years, R/o Holi Chowk, Sheoganj, District Sirohi.
----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, through the Director, Local Self Government, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Municipal Board, Sheoganj, through Executive Officer District Sirohi.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7662/2012 Lalita Devi W/o Sh. Gajjanand Agarwal, Aged about 50 years, R/ o Agarsen Marg, Sheoganj, Tehsil Sheoganj, District Sirohi, (Raj.)
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, through the Director, Local Self Government, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
(7 of 8) [CW-5319/2011]
2. Municipal Board, Sheoganj, through Executive Officer District Sirohi.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10031/2012 Subhash Chandra S/o Mathura Prasad Ji, B/c Agarwal, Aged about 55 years, R/o Sumerpur, District Pali.
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, through the Director, Local Self Government, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Municipal Board, Sheoganj, through Executive Officer District Sirohi.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4544/2012
1. Sanjay Soni S/o Shri Parasmal Soni, B/c Soni, aged about 37 years, R/o Modiyon ka Bass, Sheoganj.
2. Niraj Kumar S/o Shri Ambalal Soni, B/c Soni, Aged about 34 years, R/o Modiyon Ka Bass, Sheoganj.
----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, through the Director, Local Self Government, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Municipal Board, Sheoganj, through Executive Officer District Sirohi.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4545/2012 Praveen Kumar S/o Shri Chhaganlal Ji, B/c Soni, Aged about 42 years, R/o Modiyon ka Bass, Sheoganj.
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, through the Director, Local Self Government, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Municipal Board, Sheoganj, through Executive Officer District Sirohi.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. L. Jain
(8 of 8) [CW-5319/2011]
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Achraj Singh Saluja for
Mr. R. S. Saluja
Mr. D. D. Chitlangi
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
14/09/2022
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Learned counsel for the respondents submit that the
controversy involved in all the writ petitions is squarely covered by
the judgment of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.4113/2017 (Anil Bhandari & Ors. V/s State of
Rajasthan & Ors.) decided on 06.05.2019.
Learned counsel for the petitioners are not in a position to
controvert the submissions of the learned counsel for the
respondents.
Thus, the present writ petitions are dismissed in light of the
judgment in the case of Anil Bhandari (Supra) decided on
06.05.2019.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 144, 146 to 157, 159 to 163, 166, 167- nitin/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!