Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ramdev vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 11303 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11303 Raj
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Ramdev vs State Of Rajasthan on 9 September, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1157/2022

Ramdev S/o Shri Rambishan, Aged About 51 Years, R/o 10 K.d.
Rawal Vill. Ps Rawla Dist. Sri Ganganagar (Presently Lodged At
Central Jail Sri Ganganagar)
                                                                      ----Appellant
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                    ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)          :     Mr. Devender Singh Thind
                                Mr. Amit Kumar
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                     Order

09/09/2022

     Admit.

     Issue notice.

     Learned Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of

respondent -State. Hence, notice need not be issued.

     Heard learned counsel for the parties on S.B. Suspension

of Sentence (Appeal) No.649/2022.

     Learned counsel for the appellant has drawn attention of this

Court to the statement of PW-6 (Doctor), which reflects that there

was no injuries in the Labia Majora & Minora of the prosecutrix.

The FSL report did not contain the spermatozoa from the samples

taken.

     Learned   counsel        for    the     appellant           submits   that   the

complications arose because the appellant entered into a second

marriage. Learned counsel further submits that the prosecutrix is

the daughter of the appellant. Learned counsel also submits that


                     (Downloaded on 09/09/2022 at 09:33:11 PM)
                                     (2 of 3)                     [CRLAS-1157/2022]


the appellant has already undergone the sentence of about six

years and seven month's.

     Learned   Public   Prosecutor         opposes         the   suspension    of

sentence application.

     Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of

the case and on conjoint consideration of the submissions as well

as the factual matrix, this Court deems it just and proper to

suspend the substantive sentence awarded to the accused

applicant-appellant.

     Accordingly, S.B. Suspension of Sentence (Appeal) filed

under Section 374 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the

substantive sentence passed by the trial court vide judgment

dated 19.07.2022 in Sessions Case No.02/2021 against appellant-

Ramdev S/o Shri Rambishan shall remain suspended till final

disposal of the aforesaid appeal, provided he executes a personal

bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/-

each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his

appearance in this Court on 12.10.2022 and whenever ordered to

do so, till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated

below:-

     1.    That he will appear before the trial Court in the
           month of January of every year till the appeal is
           decided.
     2.    That if the appellant changes the place of
           residence, they will give in writing his changed
           address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel
           in the High Court.
     3.    Similarly, if the sureties change their address,
           they will give in writing their changed address to
           the trial Court.

     The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-appellant in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-



                   (Downloaded on 09/09/2022 at 09:33:11 PM)
                                                                             (3 of 3)                   [CRLAS-1157/2022]



                                   appellant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

                                   be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

                                   not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

                                   pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

                                   accused appellant do not appear before the trial court, the learned

                                   trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

                                   cancellation of bail.

                                                                    (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

4-/Jitender/nirmala

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter