Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ram Singh vs Mahendra Singh
2022 Latest Caselaw 3185 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3185 Raj
Judgement Date : 2 March, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Ram Singh vs Mahendra Singh on 2 March, 2022
Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Writ Restoration No. 20/2022

Ram Singh S/o Shri Gujar Singh, Aged About 60 Years, Byecaste Majhabi Sikh, R/o Chak 5 ND, Tehsil Anoopgarh, District Sri Ganganagar (Rajasthan).

----Petitioner Versus

1. Mahendra Singh S/o Shri Kala Singh, Aged About 45 Years, Byecaste Majhabi Sikh, R/o Village Khal, Tehsil Anoopgarh, District Sri Ganganagar (Rajasthan).

2. Santokh Singh S/o Shri Kala Singh, Aged About 43 Years, Byecaste Majhabi Sikh, R/o Village Khal, Tehsil Anoopgarh, District Sri Ganganagar (Rajasthan).

3. Karamjeet Kaur D/o Shri Kala Singh W/o Shri Baldev Singh, Aged About 36 Years, Byecaste Majhabi Sikh, R/o 10 MD, At Present 2 RB Bricks Bhatta, Tehsil Padampur, District Sri Ganganagar (Rajasthan).

4. Sub Registrar, Anoopgarh, District Sri Ganganagar (Rajasthan).

5. District Collector, Sri Ganaganagar (Rajasthan).

6. Pratap Singh, S/o Shri Gujar Singh, Aged 47 Yrs.

6/1. Paramjeet Kaur W/o Shri Pratap Singh, Aged About 48 Years, Bycaste Majhabi Sikh, R/o Chak 5 ND, Tehsil Anoopgarh, District Sri Ganganagar (Rajasthan).

6/2. Dharmendra Singh S/o Shri Pratap Singh, Aged About 26 Years, Bycaste Majhabi Sikh, R/o Chak 5 ND, Tehsil Anoopgarh, District Sri Ganganagar (Rajasthan).

6/3. Sarvjeet Kaur D/o Shri Pratap Singh, Bycaste Majhabi Sikh, R/o Chak 5 ND, Tehsil Anoopgarh, District Sri Ganganagar (Rajasthan).

6/4. Baljinder Singh S/o Shri Pratap Singh, Aged About 20 Years, Bycaste Majhabi Sikh, R/o Chak 5 ND, Tehsil Anoopgarh, District Sri Ganganagar (Rajasthan)

(2 of 3) [WRES-20/2022]

7. Lakhvinder Singh S/o Shri Gyan Singh, Aged About 33 Years, Byecaste Majhabi Sikh, R/o Chak 5 ND, Tehsil Anoopgarh, District Sri Ganganagar (Rajasthan).

8. Gursewak Singh S/o Shri Gyan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, Byecaste Majhabi Sikh, R/o Chak 5 ND, Tehsil Anoopgarh, District Sri Ganganagar (Rajasthan).

9. Satnam Singh S/o Shri Gyan Singh, Aged About 27 Years, Byecaste Majhabi Sikh, R/o Chak 5 ND, Tehsil Anoopgarh, District Sri Ganganagar (Rajasthan).

10. Charanjeet Kaur W/o Shri Sukhdev Singh, Aged About 40 Years, Byecaste Majhabi Sikh, R/o Chak 5 ND, Tehsil Anoopgarh, District Sri Ganganagar (Rajasthan).

11. Mandeep Singh S/o Shri Sukhdev Singh, Aged About 27 Years, Byecaste Majhabi Sikh, R/o Chak 5 ND, Tehsil Anoopgarh, District Sri Ganganagar (Rajasthan).

12. Sandeep Singh S/o Shri Sukhdev Singh, Aged About 27 Years, Byecaste Majhabi Sikh, R/o Chak 5 ND, Tehsil Anoopgarh, District Sri Ganganagar (Rajasthan).

13. Kulwant Kaur D/o Gujjar Singh, Byecaste Majhabi Sikh, R/o Padampur, District Sri Ganganagar (Rajasthan).

14. Chinder Kaur D/o Gujjar Singh, By Caste Majbi Sikh, R/o Bucho Mandi, Tehsil And District Bathinda, Punjab.

15. Gurpreet Kaur D/o Gujjar Singh, Byecaste Majhabi Sikh, R/o Rawla, Tehsil Gharsana, District Sri Ganganagar (Rajasthan).

                                                                ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)        :     Mr. Gyan Jyoti
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. R. Bhatnagar



HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Judgment / Order

02/03/2022

The present restoration application has been filed on account

of the fact that the defects pointed out by the Registry were not

(3 of 3) [WRES-20/2022]

removed. Vide order dated 13.12.2021, a week's time was

granted to the petitioner for removing the defects failing which,

the writ petition was ordered to be dismissed without further

reference to the Court.

Since the defects were not removed, the writ petition was

dismissed vide order dated 10.02.2022 for non-compliance of the

order passed by this Court on 13.12.2021.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that the

defects pointed out by the office shall be removed by him within a

period of one week.

The restoration application is not seriously opposed by the

learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is

allowed. The S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5931/2019 is restored at

its original number.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 60-/Vivek/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter