Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5014 Raj
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2022
(1 of 2) [CRLLA-396/2018]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 396/2018
Pokarmal S/o Late Rameshwardas Chamdiya, Aged About 78
Years, R/o H.no.3/62 Housing Board, Hanumangarh
----Appellant
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. Ramswaroop S/o Ramrakh Bishnoi, 11, Tk, Raisinghnagar,
Sriganganagar.
3. Karan Singh S/o Anad Singh Rajpoot, Ward No.14, Shakti
Nagar
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumbhat
Mr. Sheetal Kumbhat
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
04/04/2022
In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its
highly infectious Omicron variant, abundant caution is being
maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of
all concerned.
The appellant has preferred this criminal leave to appeal
claiming the following reliefs:-
"a) The instant leave to appeal may kindly be granted to
the appellant;
b) the present appeal may kindly be allowed, and;
c) the judgment and order impugned dated 27.08.2018
may kindly be set aside and the appellants may be
convicted for the charges leveled against them, and
no benefit of probation should be given to them."
(Downloaded on 07/04/2022 at 08:16:48 PM)
(2 of 2) [CRLLA-396/2018]
Counsel for the appellant submits that due to wrongful
allegation upon the appellant, who is a reputed person of the
society, has resulted into his defamation.
Counsel for the appellant submits that it is alleged that the
appellant used his daughter-in-law to level false allegation against
Bhanwar Singh.
Counsel for the appellant informs the Court that Bhanwar
Singh, was convicted for offence under Section 354 of IPC, vide
judgment dated 22.04.2003.
Counsel for the appellant submits that respondents No.2 & 3
stood as witness in support of main accused Bhanwar Singh.
Counsel for the appellant submits that Bhanwar Singh has
expired, thus, the appeal against him stood abated.
Learned Public Prosecutor submits that since main accused,
is not before this Court, who was convicted for offence under
Section 354 of IPC, then the present leave to appeal, which is
against the witnesses, would be of no significance, thus,
submitted that the order passed by learned trial court be affirmed.
This Court after going through record of case as well as
hearing the submissions advanced is not inclined to allow present
leave to appeal, therefore, the same is dismissed.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
89-nirmala/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!