Saturday, 13, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kanchan Saharan vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 16454 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16454 Raj
Judgement Date : 28 October, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Kanchan Saharan vs State Of Rajasthan on 28 October, 2021
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
               S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14807/2021

Kanchan Saharan D/o Dharmpal, Aged About 29 Years, Village
Thalarka,   Tehsil   Nohar,           District    Hanumangarh.        At    Present
Working As Teacher Grade-Iii Level-Ii (English) Posted At Govt.
Upper Primary School, Karnisar Branch, Tehsil Suratgarh, District
Sri Ganganagar.
                                                                     ----Petitioner
                                        Versus
1.      State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
        Of Secondary Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat,
        Jaipur.
2.      The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3.      The District Education Officer (Headquarter), Elementary,
        Sri Ganganagar.
4.      Chief Block Education Officer, Suratgarh, District Sri
        Ganganagar.
                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)           :    Mr. Inderjeet Yadav
For Respondent(s)           :    Mr. Vishal Jangid, Dy.GC



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                        Order

28/10/2021

     In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant

caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court,

for the safety of all concerned.

     Learned      counsel       for     the      petitioner      submit    that   the

controversy involved in this writ petition is akin to one decided by

this Court in bunch of cases led by Prem Bai Meena Vs. State of

Rajasthan & Ors. : SB Civil Writ Petition No.11136/2017 decided by

Jaipur Bench on 24.07.2017.


                     (Downloaded on 28/10/2021 at 09:40:59 PM)
                                                                             (2 of 2)                   [CW-14807/2021]



                                         Mr. Vishal Jangid, learned counsel for the respondents, is not

                                   in a position to dispute the aforesaid position of facts and law.

                                         The petitioner is directed to furnish a representation in light

                                   of   guidelines   dated     24.08.2021           or     any      other   applicable

                                   guideline/circular before the concerned District Education Officer

                                   within a period of one week, along with photo- stat copy of the

                                   guideline/circular and certified copy of the order instant. The

                                   petitioner may also point out any vacant post in her district and

                                   judgment, which she wishes to rely upon.

                                         In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid

                                   period, the competent authority of respondent shall consider and

                                   decide the same in accordance with law as early as possible,

                                   preferably within a period of two weeks.

                                         Until petitioner's representation is decided, the petitioner

                                   shall be permitted to discharge her duties at present place of

                                   posting (before passing of the impugned order).

                                         It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the

                                   representation has been issued only with a view to ensure

                                   expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievance. The same may not

                                   be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a

                                   particular manner.

                                         The writ petition as well as stay application stand disposed of

                                   accordingly.

                                                                 (DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

132-SKant/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter