Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rinku Kumari Solanki vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 16269 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16269 Raj
Judgement Date : 26 October, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Rinku Kumari Solanki vs State Of Rajasthan on 26 October, 2021
Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 5797/2021

1. Rinku Kumari Solanki D/o Galba Ram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Jagnath Mahadev Vali Gali, Rajendra Nagar, Jalore At Present Reside At House No. 86, Sonariya Tura, Village Sayla, Tehsil Sayla, District Jalore (Raj.)

2. Joga Ram S/o Shri Darga Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o House No. 86, Sonariya Tura, Village Sayla, Tehsil Sayla, District Jalore (Raj.)

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Ministry Of Home Affairs, Jaipur (Raj.)

2. The Superintendent Of Police, Jalore (Raj.)

3. Station House Officer, Police Station Sayla, Dist. Jalore (Raj.)

4. Station House Officer, Police Station Jalore Kotwali Dist.

Jalore (Raj.)

5. Mahesh Kumar S/o Shri Sanwal Ram, R/o Khara Kunwa, Tekra Bas, District Jalore.

6. Mapi W/o Shri Bhanwar Lal, R/o Khara Kunwa, Tekra Bas, District Jalore.

7. Jawra Ram S/o Shri Mangi Lal, R/o Khara Kunwa, Tekra Bas, District Jalore.

8. Devi W/o Vikram, R/o Khara Kunwa, Tekra Bas, District Jalore.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Sankhala For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mool Singh Bhati, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Judgment / Order

26/10/2021

1. The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc.

petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary

directions to the official respondents to provide adequate security

and protection to the petitioners on the ground that the

petitioners who being major are living in the company of each

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-5797/2021]

other but the company of the petitioners is not palatable to the

relatives of the petitioner No.1 and they are facing grave threat of

life and liberty at their hands.

2. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on

an overall consideration of the facts and circumstances of the

case, this Court is of the view that nobody can be permitted to

take law in his own hands merely because the petitioners being

major are living in the company of each other. Thus, this Court

deems it proper to direct the petitioners to appear before the

Superintendent of Police, Jalore who shall hear the grievance of

the petitioners and take appropriate steps for safety and security

of the petitioners as they are apprehending untoward incident at

the hands of family members of the petitioner No. 1.

3. Consequently, the present misc. petition stands

disposed of by issuing direction to the Superintendent of Police,

Jalore to take appropriate steps for safety and security of the

petitioners at the hands of those, who are opposed to their

relationship.

4. It is made clear that this order is not a proof of age of

the petitioners and any observations in this order shall not affect

any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners

at the instances of their relatives.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

108-Praveen/Shahenshah/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter