Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17765 Raj
Judgement Date : 25 November, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 854/2016
Smt. Vimla @ Bimla & Ors.
----Appellants Versus Rajesh Kumar & Ors.
----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 997/2016 Smt. Nemi & Anr.
----Appellants Versus Rajesh Kumar & Ors.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. S.K. Sankhla. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh on behalf of Mr. B.L. Bhati.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Order
25/11/2021
As per Office report, PF and notices for the unserved
respondent No.1 have not been filed.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants-
claimants stated that the respondent No.1 (Rajesh Kumar S/o
Sona Ram) is the driver of the offending vehicle and, therefore,
service of the notices upon him may kindly be dispensed with.
In view of the submissions made hereinabove, the service of
the notices upon the respondent No.1 (Rajesh Kumar) in both the
appeals is dispensed with at the risk and cost of the appellants-
claimants.
Service is complete.
(2 of 2) [CMA-854/2016]
It is noticed that the CMA No. 854/2016 has already been
admitted by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 04.07.2018
and the connected appeal has been filed by the claimants against
the same impugned judgment and award, therefore, it appears
appropriate to place both these appeals in due course.
Let both these appeals be placed for hearing in due course.
(DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA),J 39-40-Mohan/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!