Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17732 Raj
Judgement Date : 25 November, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17959/2019
Gandharv Sen Mahrishi S/o Shri Narayan S. Mahrishi, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of House No. 15/1186, Nirmala House Maharshi Colony, Ganesh Nagar, Pahada, Udaipur (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner Versus
1. Maharana Pratap University Of Agriculture And Tech., Udaipur Through Its Registrar.
2. Director, Directorate Of Extension Education, Maharana Pratap University Of Agriculture And Technology, Udaipur.
3. Dean, Rajasthan College Of Agriculture, Udaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Vyas
For Respondent(s) : Mr. G.R. Punia assisted by
Mr. Mahaveer Bhanwariya
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
25/11/2021
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner being
aggrieved with the order dated 19th September, 2019 (Annex.-14)
passed by the respondent-University, whereby the petitioner who
was earlier getting pay in the pay scale 1400-2600 was refixed in
the pay scale 1200-2050.
The respondent-University has filed reply to the writ petition,
wherein it is mentioned that the pay scale of the petitioner was
refixed as 1200-2050 as per the order dated 16.08.2019 (Annex.-
R-2) passed by the Agricultural (Group-3), Department,
Government of Rajasthan.
(2 of 2) [CW-17959/2019]
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the
order impugned (Annex.-14) is passed without providing any
opportunity of hearing.
Pursuant to the query raised by this Court the counsel for the
petitioner has failed to satisfy this Court that he was entitled to
get salary in the pay scale of 1400-2600 instead of 1200-2050.
Taking into consideration the above facts and circumstances
of the case, I do not find any merit in the challenge of the
impugned order (Annex.-14).
Hence, this writ petition is dismissed.
However, it is made clear that in the order dated 16.08.2019
(Annex.-R-2) passed by the Agricultural (Group-3), Department,
Government of Rajasthan, it is mentioned that the excess amount
paid to an employee will be borne by the respondent-University, it
is directed that the excess amount paid to the petitioner shall not
be recovered from him as there is no allegations made against the
petitioner that he has misrepresented or played fraud in getting
the higher pay scale and same was given to him by the
respondent-University.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
65-Arun/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!