Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2685 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1319/2021
Amit Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Kishore Sharan Sharma, R/o Plot
No. 14, Ganpati Nagar Benad Jaipur (Raj.) 302012
----Petitioner
Versus
Ajendra Singh Khidiya S/o Omendra Singh Khidiya, R/o Plot No.
3, Shyam Colony, Jodla Power House, Harmada, Jaipur (Raj.)
302032.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Singh Tanwar, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
07/07/2021
This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has
been filed against the order dated 28.01.2021 passed by
Metropolitan Magistrate No.5, Jaipur Metropolitan (First) in case
No.87/2019, whereby the application filed by the petitioner is
dismissed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
respondent has filed the complaint under Section 138 of the N.I.
Act against the petitioner in which respondent has given his
statement before the trial court. In his statement, he stated that
he had taken Rs.4,80,000/- from her mother for giving to the
petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that
the petitioner had filed the application before the trial court for
summoning of the bank statement of the respondent's mother and
mother of the respondent in the witness-box. So, he can cross-
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-1319/2021]
examine in that issue. Trial court had wrongly rejected the
application filed by the petitioner. So, the petition filed by the
petitioner be allowed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the judgment
passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rajaram Prasad Yadav
Vs. State of Bihar and another, reported in (2013) 14 SCC
461 and V. N. Patil Vs. K. Niranjan Kumar & Ors. in Criminal
Appeal No(s).267/2021(Arising out of SLP(Crl.)
NO(s).8965/2018) decided on 04.03.2021.
A perusal of the order impugned reveals that the trial court
had assigned cogent reasons for rejecting the application. So, the
petition filed by the petitioner is devoid of merit and liable to be
rejected.
Therefore, the criminal misc. petition is dismissed.
The stay application also stands disposed of.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Jatin /17
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!