Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Laxminarayan Bhati vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 11743 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11743 Raj
Judgement Date : 28 July, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Laxminarayan Bhati vs State Of Rajasthan on 28 July, 2021
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15122/2018

Laxminarayan Bhati S/o Jeeturam, Aged About 64 Years, By Caste Mali, Chotina Kuan, Near Ramdevji Temple, Bikaner

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.)

2. The Chief Engineer (Rural), Public Health Engineering Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur

3. The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Circle Bikaner (Raj)

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. MS Purohit

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

28/07/2021

1. After arguing for some time, Mr. MS Purohit, learned counsel

for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if

the respondents are directed to consider his representation, which

he would be filing (within a period of 15 days from today) in the

light of judgment rendered by this Court in Sohan Lal Mathur Vs.

State of Rajasthan (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3631/2008),

decided on 17.11.2008, which has subsequently been confirmed

up till the Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP No.14932/2012.

2. The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with a direction to

the petitioner to file representation ventilating his grievance along

with a copy of the judgment dated 17.11.2018 rendered in the

(2 of 2) [CW-15122/2018]

case of Sohan Lal Mathur (supra) and a certified copy of the order

instant within a period of two weeks from today.

3. If such representation is so addressed, the competent

authority shall consider the same and do the needful in

accordance with law within a period of eight weeks thereafter.

4. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the

petitioner's representation has been issued only with a view to

ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievance. The same

may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation

in a particular manner.

(DINESH MEHTA),J 263-Amar/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter