Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11116 Raj
Judgement Date : 19 July, 2021
(1 of 2) [CRLMP-3401/2021]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 3401/2021
Mithu Khan S/o Shri Ala Jiwaya, Aged About 49 Years, R/o 07 Kyd, Tehsil Khajuwala, District Bikaner Through Power Of Attorney Holder Vinod Kumar S/o Shri Dharamveer, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Chak 24 B.d., Tehsil Khajuwala, District Bikaner (Raj.)
----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Bhati, PP
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
19/07/2021
In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant
caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court,
for the safety of all concerned.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Mithu Khan is
before this Court through the power of attorney holder Shri Vinod
Kumar. Learned counsel for the petitioner thus submits that this
petition represents both Mithu Khan and Vinod Kumar.
The petitioner has preferred this criminal misc. petition
praying that the order dated 03.07.2021 passed by learned
Additional Sessions Judge, Raisinghnagar, District Sriganganagr in
Criminal Misc. Case No.239/2021 (CIS No.17/2021) be set aside,
whereby the said Court refused to release the vehicle Tata Trailer
bearing registration No.RJ-07-GC-9613 to the petitioner.
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-3401/2021]
The learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai vs. State of Gujarat, (2002) 10
SCC 283, to contend that the Supreme court has held that the
vehicle should not be permitted to remain parked in the police
station as same shall gather rust and shall not remain useful.
Learned Public Prosecutor is not in a position to refute the
above position.
Relying upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case
of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai (supra), the present misc. petition is
allowed and the trial court is directed to release the vehicle Tata
Trailer bearing registration No.RJ-07-GC-9613 on supardaginama in
favour of petitioner on usual conditions, which the trial court
deems fit, provided he furnishes a bank guarantee of
Rs.7,00,000/- with the trial court.
Needless to say, trial court shall make verification that the
petitioner is a registered owner of the vehicle.
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
47-Sudheer/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!