Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11113 Raj
Judgement Date : 19 July, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7650/2007
Bije Singh S/o Shri Hem Singh by caste Rajput, age about 80 years, R/o Village Bhaluri, Colonization Tehsil Kolayat No.1, Distt. Bikaner.
----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Colonization Tehsildar, Kolayat No.1.
2. The Deputy Colonization Commissioner, Bikaner.
3. Shri Kuldeep Sharma, Member, Board of Revenue, Ajmer.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Varun Goyal
For Respondent(s) : Mr. D.K. Joshi
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
19/07/2021
This petition is directed against the order dated 11.10.07
passed by the Board of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer whereby
reference made by the Deputy Commissioner (Colonisation),
Bikaner, in purported exercise of power conferred under Section
232 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (Act of 1955) vide order
dated 23.06.99, for setting the order dated 19.06.82 passed by
the Assistant Commissioner (Colonisation) recording the names of
petitioners as "Gair-Khatedar(s)" in the revenue record, has been
answered in favour of State.
With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard at this
stage.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners contended that
the controversy involved in the instant petition stands covered by
(2 of 2) [CW-7650/2007]
Bench decision of this Court in DBSAW No.789/2003-
RamzanKhan Vs. State of Rajasthan, wherein after due
consideration of all the relevant aspects this Court held that
Deputy Commissioner(Colonisation) is not competent to make
reference in exercise of powers conferred under Section 232 of the
Act of 1955.
The issue raised in the petition being squarely covered by
decision in Ramzan Khna's case is not disputed by the counsel
appearing for the respondent-State.
Accordingly, in the light of Bench decision of this Court in
Ramzan Khan's case (supra), the writ petition is allowed. The
order impugned dated 11.10.07 passed by the Board of Revenue,
Ajmer in Reference Case No.1113/2001 R.T. Act/Bikaner, is set
aside. However, it is made clear that the competent authority shall
not be precluded from making reference afresh in accordance with
law.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
77-Arun/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!