Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Laxman vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 10650 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10650 Raj
Judgement Date : 13 July, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Laxman vs State Of Rajasthan on 13 July, 2021
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
                                        (1 of 3)                  [SOSA-435/2019]


     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
 S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal)
                              No. 435/2019




Laxman S/o Shri Ghisa Ram, By caste Meghwal, Aged About 23
Years, resident of Juni Endla, Police Station Guda Endla, District
Pali. [Lodged In District Jail Pali]
                                                                  ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)        :     Mr. KL Chouhan
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. AR Choudhary, PP



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                    Order

13/07/2021

     In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant

caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court,

for the safety of all concerned.

     Heard learned counsel for the parties.

     Counsel for the appellant has drawn attention of this Court to

the statement of prosecutrix (PW1).

     The prosecutrix in her statement deposed that she is a

married girl and was brought up at her maternal grand-parent's

place wherefrom she was taken away by the present-appellant.

     The prosecutrix further stated that from Endla they went to

Rani and from Rani they went to Falna and from Falna they took a

train to Bombay and from Bombay after staying for two days, they




                    (Downloaded on 14/07/2021 at 08:52:25 PM)
                                           (2 of 3)                 [SOSA-435/2019]



again took a train to Jodhpur. Thereafter, they again went to

Bombay in train.

     The prosecutrix submits that out of fear she did not raise any

alarm and stated her aged be of 17 years.

     Counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is in

custody     since   11.11.2016        and     has      already    undergone   the

sentence of about four and half years.

     Learned P.P. opposes the bail application.

     This Court on conjoint consideration of the statement made

by the prosecutrix (PW1) and also the custody undergone by the

present appellant, is inclined to suspend the sentence.

     Accordingly, this application for suspension of sentence is

allowed and it is directed that the sentence awarded to appellant/s

- Laxman S/o Shri Ghisa Ram by the learned Special Judge,

POCSO Act Cases, No.3, Pali vide judgment dated 19.03.2019 in

Sessions Case No.169/2018 shall remain suspended till final

disposal of aforesaid appeal provided he executes a personal bond

for a sum of Rs.50,000/- along with two solvent sureties in the

sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial

court for his appearance before this Court on 16.08.2021 and

whenever called upon to do so till the disposal of the appeal on

the conditions inidcated below:-

      (1)     That he/she/they will appear before the trial court in
      the month of January of every year till the appeal is
      decided.
      (2)     That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence,
      he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed
      address to the trial court as well as to the counsel in the
      High Court.




                      (Downloaded on 14/07/2021 at 08:52:25 PM)
                                                                            (3 of 3)                [SOSA-435/2019]


                                         (3)   Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they
                                         will give in writing their changed address(s) to the trial
                                         court.



                                        The learned trial court shall keep the record of attendance of

                                   the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

                                   as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

                                   accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this

                                   order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal

                                   Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose

                                   relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In

                                   case the said accused-applicant(s) does not appear before the trial

                                   court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High

                                   Court for cancellation of bail.



                                                                 (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

78-Sanjay/jitender/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter