Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rekha Soni W/O Abdul Haseeb B/C ... vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 1433 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1433 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 9 February, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Rekha Soni W/O Abdul Haseeb B/C ... vs State Of Rajasthan on 9 February, 2021
Bench: Mahendar Kumar Goyal
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

          S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 733/2020

Rekha Soni W/o Abdul Haseeb, R/o Dug, Police Station Dug,
District Jhalawar, Raj.
                                                           ----Appellant/Petitioner
                                       Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP.
                                                                    ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shyam Bihari Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. F.R. Meena, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

Order

09/02/2021 This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has

been filed against the order dated 21.01.2020 passed by the

learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhawani Mandi, District

Jhalawar whereby, the application filed by the petitioner under

Section 451 Cr.P.C. for releasing the car under her ownership, has

been dismissed.

The facts in brief are that the car in question was seized in

FIR No.08/2020 in which Police after investigation has filed charge

sheet against as many as ten accused persons under various

provisions of IPC, Arms Act and under the provisions of the

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity

'the Act of 1985'). Admittedly, the petitioner is not an accused in

the charge sheet nor any contraband was recovered from the car.

Learned counsel submitted that she is registered owner of

the car in question with no rival claimants for its release. Relying

(2 of 3) [CRLMP-733/2020]

on the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court of India in case of

Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai vs. State of Gujarat, (2002) 10

SCC 290 and Coordinate Bench Judgments dated

14.08.2012 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

No.2682/2012, Phool Singh vs. State of Rajasthan and in

cases of Bal Mikand vs. State, 1994 Cri Lr (Raj) 4, Prakash

Chand vs. State of Rajasthan, S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous

Petition No.416/2010 decided on 12.03.2010 & Laxman vs.

State of Rajasthan, S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

No.61/2018 decided on 16.04.2018, he submitted that vehicle

be given on 'supurdginama' to the petitioner.

Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the criminal misc.

petition.

Heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the

record.

It is undisputed that the petitioner is registered owner of the

car in question which has not been claimed by any other person.

Although, no contraband was recovered from the car; still, it is

well settled law that a vehicle seized under the provisions of the

Act of 1985 can be released in favour of the registered owner

provided no order of confiscation has been passed.

In these circumstances, this criminal miscellaneous petition

deserves to be allowed and is accordingly allowed. The order

dated 21.01.2020 passed by the learned Additional Sessions

Judge, Bhawani Mandi, District Jhalawar is quashed and set aside.

It is directed that the Hyundai i20, RJ-17-CB-0651 be released in

favour of the petitioner on 'supurdginama' on her producing

(3 of 3) [CRLMP-733/2020]

original registration certificate and on satisfying following

conditions:-

(1) She furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.6,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.3,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with undertaking to produce the vehicle in question in the Court as and when required to do so.

(2) She shall get the vehicle in question photographed showing the registration number as well as the chassis number. Such photograph shall be taken in the presence of the Investigating Officer, to be kept on the file of the case.

(3) The personal bond of the petitioner and bonds of sureties shall carry the photographs of the petitioner and her sureties and the bond of sureties shall further carry the photographs of persons identifying them before the Court with full residential particulars of the sureties and the persons identifying them. (4) The petitioner shall undertake not to transfer the ownership of the vehicle in question and not to lease it to anyone and not to make or allow any changes in it to be made so as to make unidentifiable.

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

MADAN MEENA /32

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter