Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7646 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2021
(1 of 2) [CMA-3152/2009]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.3152/2009
1. Smt. Cheni Devi wife of Late Sh. Radhey Shyam,
2. Miss Lila Paliwal daughter of Late Sh. Radhey Shyam, aged
about 16 years.
3. Miss Lalita Paliwal daughter of Late Sh. Radhey Shyam, aged
about 13 years.
Applicant No.2 and 3 being minor through their natural Guardian
and Mother Smt. Cheni Devi wife of Late Sh. Radhey Shyam.
All residents of Village BAP, Police Station-BAP, District Jodhpur
(Rajasthan).
----Appellant
Versus
Union Of India through the General Manager, Western Railway,
Church Gate, Mumbai
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ajay Shukla with Mr. Arpit Baheti For Respondent(s) : Mr. P.C. Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
15/12/2021
1. This is an appeal filed by the claimants against the judgment
dated 02.08.2007 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Jaipur
Bench whereby claim filed by the appellants was rejected solely on
the ground that the deceased passenger alighted from the train at
Gandhi Nagar Railway Station while he had ticket upto Jaipur
Railway Station. On the said premise that the deceased alighted at
Gandhi Nagar Railway Station, he cannot be said to be a bona fide
passenger and the claim has been rejected.
(2 of 2) [CMA-3152/2009]
2. I have considered the submissions and perused the record
and also thoughtfully considered the arguments raised by the
counsel for the respondent-Railways.
3. It is an admitted position that railway ticket was possessed
by the deceased of second class for travelling upto Jaipur. The
deceased passenger alighted at Gandhi Nagar Railway Station and
Gandhi Nagar Railway Station is a part of Jaipur Railway Station
and for all intents and purposes, it cannot be said that alighting at
Gandhi Nagar Railway Station would result in the deceased being
ousted from being a bona fide passenger of the train. He cannot
be said to be passenger without railway ticket.
4. In view thereof, the conclusion drawn for rejecting the claim
petition by the Railway Claims Tribunal is found to be wholly
erroneous and the judgment dated 02.08.2007 is accordingly set
aside and the matter is remanded back to the Railway Claims
Tribunal to decide afresh the claim expeditiously within a period of
three months.
5. With the said observations, the civil misc. appeal is
accordingly allowed.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
Karan/65
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!