Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 18304 Raj
Judgement Date : 2 December, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16048/2021
1. LRs Of Daya Ram, S/o Shri Salagram Ji Mali 1/1 Smt. Aija Bai W/o Late Shri Daya Ramji, Aged About 75 Years, Salagram Ji Badi, Kalka Mata Vihar Payda, Udaipur (Raj.).
1/2 Purshotam S/o Late Shri Daya Ramji, Aged About 47 Years, Salagram Ji Badi, Kalka Mata Vihar Payda, Udaipur (Raj.).
1/3 Durga Shankar S/o Late Shri Daya Ramji, Aged About 44 Years, Salagram Ji Badi, Kalka Mata Vihar Payda, Udaipur (Raj.).
1/4 Laxmi D/o Late Shri Daya Ramji, Aged About 55 Years, 5 Saint, Near Gegorius School, Khara Kuan, Udaipur (Raj.).
2. Durga Shankar S/o Late Shri Daya Ramji, Aged About 44 Years, Arawali Complex, New New Rto Office, Payda, Udaipur (Raj.).
3. Laxmi D/o Late Shri Daya Ramji, Aged About 55 Years, 5 Saint, Near Gegorius School, Khara Kuan, Udaipur (Raj.).
4. Smt. Aija Bai W/o Late Shri Daya Ramji, Aged About 75 Years, Arawli Complex, Near New Rto Office, Payda, Udaipur (Raj.).
----Petitioners Versus
1. Kamalashankar S/o Shri Kanhaiyalal Ji Mali, Salagram Ji Badi, Lal Vihar, Gandhi Nagar, Udaipur.
2. Manohar Lal S/o Shri Kanhaiyalal Ji Mali, Salagram Ji Badi, Lal Vihar, Gandhi Nagar, Udaipur.
3. Hemraj S/o Shri Kanhaiyalal Ji Mali, Salagram Ji Badi, Lal Vihar, Gandhi Nagar, Udaipur.
4. Narendra S/o Daulat Ram Ji Mali, Near A-One School, University Road, Udaipur.
5. Narmbada D/o Late Shri Daya Ramji, In Front Of Mohan Dairy, Near Mahadeo Temple, New Bhupalpura, Udaipur (Raj.).
----Respondents
(2 of 2) [CW-16048/2021]
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prashant Tatia
For Respondent(s) :
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
02/12/2021
1. Mr. Prashant Tatia, learned counsel for the petitioners,
submits that the trial Court has committed an error in rejecting
petitioners' application under Order XIV Rule 2 of the Code of Civil
Procedure to decide issue No.3A as a preliminary issue.
2. He argues that the ground on which the plea of res-judicata
was taken by the present petitioner and issue No.3A was framed,
is only in relation to the judgment and decree dated 26.03.2014,
vide which the suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent No.1 was
dismissed and hence, the finding of the Court that it will require
detailed evidence and perusal of many orders of revenue
authorities is per-se contrary to facts.
3. The matter requires consideration.
5. Issue notice. Issue notice of stay application also, returnable
on 20.01.2022.
6. Till then, further proceedings in Case No.90/2014, pending
before the learned District Judge, Udaipur shall remain stayed.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
31-skm/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!