Yogesh vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 8724 Raj

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 256/2021

Yogesh S/o Sh. Ramchandra, Aged About 17 Years, Through Natural Guardian Father Ramchandra S/o Dhulji R/o Danki Ka Pada, P.S. Bhungda, Dist. Banswara, Rajasthan. (Presently Lodged In Observation Home, Juvenile Justice Board, Pratapgarh).

----Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

2. Praveen S/o Sh. Nathulal Ji Panchal, R/o Khamera, Dist.

Banswara, Rajasthan.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Kumar Gaur, Adv.

For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Mool Singh Bhati, PP



              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

                             Judgment / Order

01/04/2021

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner (juvenile- through his

natural guardian father Ramchandra) as well as learned Public

Prosecutor.

The allegation against the petitioner is of offence under Section

392 IPC. The bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 12 of

the Act of 2015 before Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board,

Pratapgarh was rejected vide order dated 14.01.2021. Being aggrieved

by the said order, an appeal was filed by the petitioner before the

learned District & Sessions Judge, Pratapgarh and the same has been

dismissed by learned Appellate Court vide impugned order dated

25.01.2021.

(2 of 3) [CRLR-256/2021]

Being aggrieved of the orders dated 14.01.2021 and 25.01.2021

passed by the Courts below, the petitioner has preferred this revision

petition before this Court.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is

below 18 years of age and he has falsely been implicated in this case.

Further there is no evidence to show that if the juvenile-petitioner is

released on bail, then his release is likely to bring him into association

with any known criminal, or expose them to moral, physical or

psychological danger, or that his release would defeat the ends of

justice. It is argued that learned Courts below have not appreciated the

fact that the petitioner is juvenile and entitled to get benefit of

provisions of the Act of 2015. Section 12 of the Act of 2015 clearly

provides that if the accused is juvenile, then he should be released on

bail, but learned Courts below fully ignored the provisions of the Act of

2015. The petitioner is in custody since long time and no further

detention of the petitioner is required for any purpose. Learned counsel

for the petitioner further submitted that the gravity of the offence

committed cannot be a ground to decline bail to a juvenile.

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor defended the

impugned order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board in declining the

bail to the petitioner as also the judgment passed by the Appellate

Court upholding the order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board.

I have carefully considered the submissions made by the learned

counsel for the parties and also perused the provisions of the Act of

2015.

The language of Section 12 of the Act of 2015 conveys the

intention of the Legislature to grant bail to the juvenile, irrespective of

nature or gravity of the offence, alleged to have been committed by him

and bail can be denied only in the case where there appears reasonable

(3 of 3) [CRLR-256/2021]

grounds for believing that the release is likely to bring him into

association with any known criminal, or expose him to moral, physical

or psychological danger, or that his release would defeat ends of justice.

In this context, I have also scanned through and perused the

orders passed by the courts below. Having carefully examined

provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act vis-a-vis the orders passed by the

courts below, I do not find that any of the exceptional circumstances, to

decline bail to a juvenile, as indicated in Section 12 of the Act of 2015,

is made out.

In view of the aforesaid discussion, this revision petition is

allowed and the order dated 14.01.2021 passed by the Principal

Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Pratapgarh as well as order dated

25.01.2021 passed by learned District & Sessions Judge, Pratapgarh,

declining bail to the petitioner are hereby set aside.

It is ordered that the juvenile accused-petitioner Yogesh S/o Sh.

Ramchandra, shall be released on bail in FIR No.215/2019 Police Station

Pipalkhunt, District Pratapgarh upon furnishing a personal bond by his

Natural guardian, in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with a surety in the

like amount to the satisfaction of learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile

Justice Board, Pratapgarh; with the stipulation that on all subsequent

dates of hearing, he shall appear before the said court or any other

court, during pendency of the investigation/trial in the case and that his

guardian shall keep proper look after of the delinquent child and secure

him away from the company of known criminals.

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J 157-MS/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)