Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 772 P&H
Judgement Date : 31 January, 2026
202 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
****
CWP-15866-2023 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 31.01.2026
Ghasi Ram
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and Others
...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- None for the petitioner.
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of
the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to count the
service rendered as Special Police Officer as qualifying service for the
purpose of pensionary benefits.
2. Case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment of
this Court in Sukhjeet Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others,
CWP No.9936 of 2017.
3. Learned State counsel submits that in terms of above stated judgment of this Court, the respondents authorities in the case of various officials have considered their claim and passed orders. He further asserts that appropriate authority would consider case of the petitioner in terms of judgments of this Court in Sukhjeet Singh (supra) and pass an appropriate order within 3 months from today.
1 of 2
CWP-15866-2023 (O&M) -2-
4. In the wake of statement of learned State counsel, the present
petition stands disposed of.
5. The petitioner is at liberty to move an appropriate application
within three months from today, if cause survives.
6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE
31.01.2026
Prince Chawla
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!