Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Au Small Finance Bank Limited vs District Magistrate / Deputy ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 1600 P&H

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1600 P&H
Judgement Date : 18 February, 2026

[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Au Small Finance Bank Limited vs District Magistrate / Deputy ... on 18 February, 2026

CWP-4902-2026
         2026                                                          -1-

128
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                        AT CHANDIGARH

                                                                   CWP-4902-2026
                                                                            2026
                                                       Date of decision : 18.02.202
                                                                               .2026

AU Small Finance Bank Ltd.
                                                                    .......Petitioner
                                    Versus
Deputy Commissioner cum District Magistrate, Ludhiana and others
                                                         .......Respondents


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE
           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY


Present:    Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate (through video conferencing),
            for the petitioner.

            Mr. Salil Sabhlok, Senior DAG, Punjab.

                             ****

SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE ( Oral )

1. The petitioner - bank is before this Court invoking writ as well as

supervisory jurisdiction under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India,

being aggrieved by in-action in action on the part of District Magistrate, Ludhiana

(respondent No.1) No. to decide application dated 13.11.2025 (Annexure P-2)) filed

by the petitioner u/s 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial

Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short, 'SARFAESI

Act').

1.1 It is mentioned in the petition that no proceedings under

SARFAESI Act are pending before DRT or DRAT.

2. It is stated in the application (Annexure P P-2)) that respondents

No.2 to 9 availed loan of Rs. 8,44,04,000//- from the petitioner vide two loan

1 of 4

CWP-4902-2026

accounts, and upon default in repayment, the account accounts were classified as Non-

Non

Performing Asset (NPA) on 29.07.2025, .2025, whereafter notice u/s 13 (2) of

SARFAESI Act (Annexure P-1) P 1) was issued to the respondents - borrowers on

05.08.2025, .08.2025, calling upon them to discharge th their eir liability within a period of

sixty days. The respondents - borrowers failed to comply with the said

demand and, accordingly, the secured creditor proceeded to take recourse to

measures u/s 13 (4) of SARFAESI Act by issuing possession notice.

Thereafter,, the petitioner - secured creditor filed application u/s 14 of the

SARFAESI Act on 13.11.2025.

3. The Apex Court in R.D. Jain & Co. Vs. Capital First Limited

and others, (2023) 1 SCC 675, while explaining the width and ambit of

jurisdiction u/s 14 of SARFAESI SARFAESI Act held thus :

"23. However, for taking physical possession of the secured assets in terms of Section 14 (1) of the SARFAESI Act, the secured creditor is obliged to approach the CMM/DM by way of a written application requesting for taking possession of the secured assets and documents relating thereto and for being forwarded to it (secured creditor) for further action. The statutory obligation enjoined upon the CMM/DM is to immediately move into action after receipt of a written application under Section 14 (1) of the SARFAESI Act from the secured creditor for that purpose. As soon as such an application is received, the CMM/DM is expected to pass an order after verification of compliance of all formalities by the secured creditor referred to to in the proviso in Section 14 (1) of the SARFAESI Act and after being satisfied in that regard, to take possession of the secured assets and documents relating thereto and to forward the same to the secured creditor at the earliest opportunity.

2 of 4

CWP-4902-2026

24. As mandated ndated by Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, the CMM/DM has to act within the stipulated time time-limit and pass a suitable order for the purpose of taking possession of the secured assets within a period of 30 days from the date of application which can be exten extended for such further period but not exceeding in the aggregate, sixty days. Thus, the powers exercised by the CMM/DM is a ministerial act. He cannot brook delay. Time is of the essence. This is the spirit of the special enactment.

25. As observed and held by this Court in NKGSB Coop. Bank (NKGSB Coop. Bank Ltd. v. Subir Chakravarty, (2022) 10 SCC : (2023) 1 SCC (Cri) 157, the step taken by the CMM/DM while taking possession of the secured assets and documents relating thereto is a ministerial step. It could could be taken by the CMM/DM himself/herself or through any officer subordinate to him/her, including the Advocate Commissioner who is considered as an officer of his/her court. Section 14 does not oblige the CMM/DM to go personally and take possession of the secured assets and documents relating thereto. Thus, we reiterate that the step to be taken by the CMM/DM under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, is a ministerial step. While disposing of the application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, no element of quasi- judicial function or application of mind would require. The Magistrate has to adjudicate and decide the correctness of the information given in the application and nothing more. Therefore, Section 14 does not involve an adjudicatory process qua points raised by the borrower against the secured creditor taking possession of secured assets.

assets."

3.1 Needless to say that the guidelines laid down by Coordinate

Bench in Bank of Maharashtra Vs. District Magistrate, Hisar and others,

3 of 4

CWP-4902-2026

(CWP-7018 7018-2022, decided on 28.05.2024) be adhered to by the concerned

authorities.

4. This Court, in view of District Magistrate, Ludhiana (respondent

No.1)) having failed to discharge statutory obligation u/s 14 (1) proviso of the

SARFAESI Act within stipulated time of sixty days, is compelled to issue writ

of mandamus.

5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to

respondent No.1 No. to consider and dispose ispose of the application u/s 14 of the

SARFAESI Act (Annexure P-2), P expeditiously, prefer preferably on the date already eady

fixed,, or at best, within a period of thirty (30) days thereafter thereafter.

6. We hasten to add that this order shall however be subject to any

restraint/interim/final order which may have been passed by any judicial

forum, in favour of the borrowers/guaranto borrowers/guarantors/any rs/any aggrieved person, who is

party to this lis.


                                                         ( SHEEL NAGU )
                                                          CHIEF JUSTICE




                                                        ( SANJIV BERRY )
February 18, 2026                                            JUDGE
narotam

       Whether speaking/reasoned                              Yes/No
       Whether reportable                                     Yes/No




                                   4 of 4

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter