Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mumtaz Ahmed vs State Of Punjab
2025 Latest Caselaw 3791 P&H

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3791 P&H
Judgement Date : 28 March, 2025

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Mumtaz Ahmed vs State Of Punjab on 28 March, 2025

Author: Anoop Chitkara
Bench: Anoop Chitkara
                    CRM-M-8227-2025

                                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                                         AT CHANDIGARH

                                                                                CRM-M-8227-2025
                                                                                Reserved on: 18.03.2025
                                                                                Pronounced on: 28.03.2025

                    Mumtaz Ahmed                                                ...Petitioner

                                                                Versus

                    State of Punjab                                             ...Respondent


                    CORAM:               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

                    Present:             Ms. Priya Sahoo, Advocate
                                         for the petitioner.

                                         Mr. Sukhdev Singh, AAG, Punjab.

                                                                ****
                    ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
                      FIR No.             Dated               Police Station         Sections
                      158                 21.10.2024          Dinanagar, District 318(4)/336(2)/336(3)/338/
                                                              Gurdaspur              61(2) and 340(2) of BNS


1. The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking anticipatory bail.

2. In paragraph 20 of the bail petition, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents.

3. The facts and allegations are being taken from the status report filed by the State, which reads as follows:

"5. That it is humbly submitted that the brief facts of this case are that Mr. Chandan Hans, PCS, Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Gurdaspursent a letter to SHO Police Station Dinanagar, Gurdaspur vide No 399 dated 07.10.2024 that on 02.10.2024, when the Learned Court of Mr.Chandan Hans, PCS, Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Gurdaspur was on duty someone has produced one Sapurdari order before your officials but at that time, your official has verified the genuineness of the said sapurdari order from the Naib Court of this Court and at that time, the Naib Court has conveyed to your official that the Learned Court of Mr. Chandan Hans, PCS, Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Gurdaspur has not sent any sapurdari order on duty. As such, it has came into the notice of your official that someone has produced fake release order by using forged sign and seal of the Learned Court of

Mr. Chandan Hans, PCS, Judicial Magistrate (First Class),

authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

CRM-M-8227-2025

Gurdaspur. Therefore, it is asked from you what action you have taken when it is already came to your notice that someone has produced fake sapurdari order before your official. Copy of the said sapurdari order is also attached herewith. Report be called within 02 days. Hence a case FIRNo. 158 dated 21.10.2024 under Section 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 61(2), 340(2) BNS Police Station Dinanagar has been registered against the petitioner."

4. The petitioner's counsel prays for bail by imposing any stringent conditions and contends that further pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and their family.

5. The State's counsel opposes bail and refers to the status report.

6. It would be appropriate to refer to the following portions of the status report, which read as follows:

"7. ROLE OF THE PETITIONER:-

The petitioner has preparedforged sapurdari/release order by using forged sign and seal of the Learned Court and used it as genuine.

8. THE EVIENCE AGAINST THE PETITIONER:-

The forged sapurdari/release order which was used by the petitioner as genuine and statement of criminal ahlmed of the Ld court is on record."

REASONING:

7. Given the nature of offence, pre-trial incarceration should not be a replica of post-

conviction sentencing. The evidence might be prima facie sufficient to launch prosecution or to frame charges, but this Court is not considering the evidence at that stage but is analyzing it for the stage of anticipatory bail. An analysis of the above does not justify custodial interrogation or pre-trial incarceration.

8. Given the above, the penal provisions invoked coupled with the primafacie analysis of the nature of allegations and the other factors peculiar to this case, there would be no justifiability for custodial interrogation or the pre-trial incarceration at this stage. Without commenting on the case's merits, in the facts and circumstances peculiar to this case, and for the reasons mentioned above, the petitioner makes a case for bail. This order shall come into force from the time it is uploaded on this Court's official webpage.

9. Given above, provided the petitioner is not required in any other case, the petitioner shall be released on anticipatory bail in the FIR captioned above subject to furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, and if the matter is before a Court, then the concerned Court and due to unavailability before any nearest Ilaqa Magistrate/duty Magistrate. Before accepting the surety, the concerned Officer/Court Jyoti Sharma must be satisfied that if the accused fails to appear, such surety can produce the accused.

authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

CRM-M-8227-2025

10. While furnishing a personal bond, the petitioner shall mention the following personal identification details:

1. AADHAR number

2. Passport number (If available) and when the attesting officer/court considers it appropriate or considers the accused a flight risk.

3. Mobile number (If available)

4. E-Mail id (If available)

11. This order is subject to the petitioner's complying with the following terms.

12. The petitioner is directed to join the investigation within seven days of uploading this order on the official webpage of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana and as and when called by the Investigator. The petitioner shall be in deemed custody for Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872/ Section 23 of BSA, 2023. The petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called by the Investigating Officer or any Superior Officer and shall cooperate with the investigation at all further stages as required. In the event of failure to do so, the prosecution will be open to seeking cancellation of the bail. During the investigation, the petitioner shall not be subjected to third-degree, indecent language, inhuman treatment, etc.

13. The petitioner shall abide by all statutory bond conditions and appear before the concerned Court(s) on all dates. The petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence, influence, browbeat, pressurize, induce, threaten, or promise, directly or indirectly, any witnesses, Police officials, or any other person acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case or dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Police or the Court.

14. In case the Investigator/Officer-In-Charge of the concerned Police Station arraigns another section of any penal offense in this FIR, and if the new section prescribes a maximum sentence that is not greater than the sections mentioned above, then this bail order shall be deemed to have also been passed for the newly added section(s). However, suppose the newly inserted sections prescribe a sentence exceeding the maximum sentence prescribed in the sections mentioned above; then, in that case, the Investigator/Officer-In-Charge shall give the petitioner notice of a minimum of seven days, providing an opportunity to avail the remedies available in law.

15. This bail is conditional, and the foundational condition is that if the petitioner indulges in any non-bailable offense, the State may file an application for cancellation of this bail before the Sessions Court, which shall be at liberty to cancel this bail.

16. Any observation made hereinabove is neither an expression of opinion on the case's merits nor shall the trial Court advert to these comments.

authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

CRM-M-8227-2025

17. A certified copy of this order would not be needed for furnishing bonds, and any Advocate for the Petitioner can download this order along with case status from the official web page of this Court and attest it to be a true copy. If the attesting officer wants to verify its authenticity, such an officer can also verify its authenticity and may download and use the downloaded copy for attesting bonds.

18. Petition allowed in terms mentioned above. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 28.03.2025 Jyoti Sharma

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No.

authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter