Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nasar Ali vs Parveen
2025 Latest Caselaw 2869 P&H

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2869 P&H
Judgement Date : 3 March, 2025

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Nasar Ali vs Parveen on 3 March, 2025

                     CR-1306-2025 (O&M)                                    Page 1 of 4


                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

                     123                                          CR-1306-2025 (O&M)
                                                                  Date of decision: 03.03.2025

                     Nasar Ali                                             ...Petitioner(s)

                                                            Vs.
                     Parveen                                               ...Respondent(s)

                     CORAM:          HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA

                     Present:- Mr. Imran Farooqi, Advocate for the petitioner.
                                           ***
                     NIDHI GUPTA, J.

The present petition has been filed by the plaintiff under

Article 227 of Constitution of India read with Section 151 CPC seeking

directions to the Ld. District Court, Malerkotla to expedite and conclude

the proceedings arising out of the appeal No.CMA/45/2024 titled as

'Parveen v. Nasar Ali', pending before the Ld. District Court, Malerkotla,

(ANNEXURE P-4) within a time-bound period, in the interest of justice.

2. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff inter-alia submits that

the respondent/defendant had executed an Agreement to Sell dated

24.10.2016 in favour of the petitioner for total sale consideration of Rs.8

lacs, out of which plaintiff paid Rs.3,50,000/- as earnest money. It was

mutually agreed that Sale Deed would be executed and registered on

24.10.2017. Plaintiff remained present in the Tehsil, but the respondent

failed to appear to execute the sale deed as agreed. As such, the plaintiff

instituted suit for specific performance; in which the respondent was

proceeded ex-parte. The suit was decreed ex-parte in favour of the plaintiff

vide judgment dated 15.10.2022 (Annexure P-1). No appeal was filed

against the said judgment.

3. Then the plaintiff initiated execution proceedings to enforce

decree dated 15.10.2022 (Annexure P-2). However, the respondent kept on

delaying the plaintiff's lawful rights and filed an application under Order 9

Rules 7 and 13 read with Section 151CPC to recall the ex-parte decree. The

said application was dismissed by the learned trial Court vide order dated

20.02.2024 (Annexure P-3).

4. The respondent preferred an appeal (Annexure P-4) against the

said order dated 20.02.2024, and vide order dated 30.4.2024, obtained ex-

parte stay halting the executing proceedings. Ld. Counsel submits that

pursuant to the decree, the Sale Deed for the suit property was executed on

02.04.2024 rendering the appeal infructuous. Despite this, appeal remained

pending with arguments yet to commence. It is submitted that due to the

stay of execution proceedings granted in the appeal, the petitioner is being

deprived of the fruits of decree and possession of property. It is accordingly

prayed that a direction be issued to the learned District Court, Malerkotla to

expedite and conclude the proceedings arising out of the appeal (Annexure

P-4) expeditiously.

5. Heard.

6. I find merit in the submissions advanced on behalf of the

petitioner. The suit of the petitioner was decreed ex-parte vide judgment

and decree dated 15.10.2022 (Annexure P-1). Thereafter, the petitioner had

filed an Execution Application dated nil (Annexure P-2) seeking execution of

the above said judgment and decree. It was the case of the

respondent/defendant before the learned Courts below that the

respondent came to know about the decree dated 15.10.2022 only on

12.05.2023 when the petitioner openly stated to her that he has got the ex-

parte decree from the Court; whereafter the respondent immediately

moved an application for engaging legal aid counsel, which was approved

on 13.05.2023. Thereafter, the respondent moved application dated

26.05.2023 under Order 9 Rules 7 and 13 read with Section 151 CPC for

setting aside the ex-parte order dated 01.11.2021 and decree dated

15.10.2022. The said application of the respondent was dismissed by the

learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Malerkotla vide order dated

20.02.2024 (Annexure P-3) holding that the respondent "was having due

knowledge regarding the pendency of the original suit, as her summons

reached at her house and the same were received back duly served. Thus,

the applicant/defendant has been properly served in the civil suit. Hence,

she was rightly proceeded against ex-parte by this Court vide order dated

01.11.2021 and judgment and decree dated 15.10.2022 has been rightly

passed. Resultantly, it is clear that present application is not maintainable.

Issues No. 1 and 2 are decided accordingly against the applicant/defendant

and in favour of respondent/plaintiff".

7. The respondent then filed appeal dated Nil (Annexure P-4)

against the said order dated 20.02.2024 passed by learned Civil Judge

(Junior Division), Malerkotla.

8. Perusal of the zimni orders (Annexure P-5) reveals that the Civil

Appeal of the respondent stood admitted vide order dated 14.03.2024 and

notice was issued to the petitioner for 08.04.2024. On 08.04.2024, notice

issued to the petitioner was received back unserved with the report that he

was not residing at the given address. Accordingly, fresh notice was issued

to the petitioner for 30.04.2024. On 30.04.2024, dasti summons were given

to the respondent/defendant for 17.05.2024; and further proceedings

before the Executing Court were directed to be stayed till the next date of

hearing as it was stated by learned counsel for the respondent/defendant

before the learned District Judge, Sangrur that execution is pending for

05.05.2024. On 18.05.2024, learned counsel for the petitioner put in

appearance and the matter was listed for 05.07.2024 for filing reply by the

petitioner; and so forth. It is the prayer of the petitioner/plaintiff that the

said appeal of the respondent be heard and decided expeditiously. It has

also been pointed out that in fact Appeal is rendered infructuous as Sale

Deed already stands executed in favour of the petitioner on 02.04.2024.

9. Hence, keeping in view the entirety of the facts as noted

above, the present civil revision petition is hereby allowed. The learned

Additional District Judge, Malerkotla is directed to decide the appeal

bearing No. CMA/45/2024 filed by the respondent expeditiously, preferably

within 6 months from today.

10. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

03.03.2025 (NIDHI GUPTA) Divyanshi JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter