Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1081 P&H
Judgement Date : 18 January, 2025
Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:009056-DB
CWP-1272-2025 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
113 CWP-1272-2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision:-18.01.2025
Harmandeep Singh ....Petitioner
Vs.
Income Tax Officer,Ward 1, Karnal & ors. ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: Mr. B.M. Monga, Mr. Rohit Kaura and
Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocates
for the petitioner
Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Sr. Standing counsel with
Ms. Muskan Gupta, Advocate
for the respondent-Union of India.
***
SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J.
1. Challenge in the instant writ petition is to notice dated
06.04.2023 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short
'Act 1961")and impugned order dated 06.04.2023 issued under Section 148
A(d) of the Act, 1961, for AY 2019-2020.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the issue
involved in the present writ petition is covered by the judgment passed by a
Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the cases of Jatinder Singh Bhangu vs.
Union of India and others, passed in CWP No. 15745-2024 and connected
matter, decided on 19.07.2024 and Jasjit Singh vs. Union of India and
others (CWP No. 21509-2023 and other connected matters), decided on
29.07.2024 .
3. Learned counsel appearing for Union of India has also not
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:009056-DB
disputed the same.
4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
whole records of the case.
5. The petitioner has challenged the 06.04.2023 issued under
Section 148 of the Act, 1961 and impugned order dated 06.04.2023 issued
under Section 148 A(d) of the Act, 1961, for AY 2019-2020, on the ground
that the Issuing Authority had no jurisdiction to issue the same, in view of
the circular/notification dated 29.03.2022 of the CBDT, wherein, it has been
specifically enumerated that the NFAC has exclusive power to issue the
notice under Section 148 of the Act, 1961.
6. A Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Jatinder Singh Bhangu's
case (supra) and Jasjit Singh's case (supra), allowed the writ petitions on
the same issue, as raised in the present writ petition, by granting liberty to
the revenue to follow the procedure as laid down under the Act, 1961 and
proceed accordingly, if so advised.
7. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of, in
terms of Jatinder Singh Bhangu's case (supra), decided on 19.07.2024 and
Jasjit Singh's case (supra), decided on 29.07.2024
8. All the pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(ARUN PALLI) (SUDEEPTI SHARMA)
JUDGE JUDGE
18.01.2025
Gaurav Arora
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!