Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Meeto vs State Of Punjab
2025 Latest Caselaw 6075 P&H

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6075 P&H
Judgement Date : 4 December, 2025

[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Meeto vs State Of Punjab on 4 December, 2025

               CRM-M-68359-2025 (O&M)                 1



                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
                                           AT CHANDIGARH
             131
                                                                    CRM-M-68359-2025 (O&M)
                                                                    Date of decision: 04.12.2025

             Meeto
                                                                                      ....Petitioner
                                                 Versus

             State of Punjab
                                                                                    ...Respondent

             CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
                                              *****
             Present : Ms. Arshdeep Kaur, Advocate for
                       Mr. Yashpal Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner
                                             *****
             AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS for

quashing of order dated 28.08.2025 passed in NDPS-437-2021, vide which the

bail of the petitioner stands cancelled and his bail/surety bonds were forfeited in

FIR No.137 dated 24.06.2021, under Section 21/29/61/85 of NDPS Act,

registered at Police Station City Sunam, Sangrur, Punjab.

2. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner was granted bail in the

FIR vide order dated 29.07.2021, whereafter, he continued to appear before the

trial Court but for 28.08.2025, she being illiterate lady, had noted down the

wrong date as 28.10.2025 as earlier the hearing was conducted after a gap of six

monts, leading to cancellation of her bail and forfeiture of bail/surety bonds to

the State and non-bailable warrants had been issued for 04.10.2025. Her non-

appearance was neither intentional nor deliberate but due to the aforesaid bona

fide reason. She is ready and willing to join the proceedings and prays for grant

of one opportunity for her to surrender before the trial Court, even if the same is

subject to costs.

3. Notice of motion.

4. At the asking of the Court,

and submits that the non-bailable

warrants have been rightly issued against the petitioner, as she had absented from

the proceedings.

5. No order prejudicial to the rights of the private respondent is being

proposed to be passed by this Court, thus, there is no requirement of impleading

him as party.

6. Heard.

7. The very purpose of issuance of warrants of arrest, is to compel and

secure the presence of the accused to face trial and establish the rule of law, as

also to ensure finalization of the proceedings.

8. This Court in CRM-M-36490-2022, titled as Major Singh vs. State

of Punjab, decided on 15.09.2022, CRM-M-38277-2022, Surjit Singh vs. State

of Punjab, dated 26.08.2022 and CRM-M-39000-2022, titled as Raghav vs.

State of Punjab, decided on 09.09.2022, had set aside the orders of non-bailable

warrants.

9. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, judgments

referred to hereinabove, the readiness and willingness of the petitioner to

surrender and join the proceedings, which was incumbent upon her for the

culmination of the same, the present petition deserves to be and is allowed, in the

interest of justice, so as to facilitate expediting the trial and for taking it to its

logical end.

10. As a consequence of the aforesaid, the impugned order dated

28.08.2025 is set aside and the petitioner is directed to surrender before the

learned trial Court on or before 19.12.2025 and deposit Rs.15,000/- as costs with

the Nofal Ek Umeed Charitable Trust, running langar sewa for poor patients and

their relatives in PGI Chandigarh, having its Account No.0579073000000156, IFSC

Code-IFSCSIBL0000579, Bank-The South India Bank Limited, Chandigarh, on

furnishing bail/surety bonds, the trial Court shall release her on bail subject to its

satisfaction. She is also directed to furnish an undertaking by way of an affidavit

that she will appear on each and every date of hearing before the learned

Appellate Court, unless specifically exempted by the Court. She shall not leave

the country without prior permission of the Court. The trial Court may impose

any other condition that it may deem appropriate in the facts and circumstances

of the present case.

12. The present petition is accordingly allowed.

13. Before parting with this order, it is made abundantly clear that in

case the petitioner does not adhere to the aforesaid, the present petition shall be

deemed to have been dismissed without any reference to this Court.

(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 04.12.2025 M.Kamra

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter