Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Devinder Paul Singh Sandhu vs Pr Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax Nwr ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 18000 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18000 P&H
Judgement Date : 26 September, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Devinder Paul Singh Sandhu vs Pr Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax Nwr ... on 26 September, 2024

Author: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

Bench: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

                                Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:128098-DB




CWP-12964-2024
          2024 (O&M)

                                   Page 1 of 3

112

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                      CHANDIGARH

                                                    CM-15682-CWP-2024 and
                                                   CM-15683-CWP-2024 in/and
                                                     CWP-12964-2024 (O&M)
                                                  Date of Decision: 26.09.2024
                                                                         .2024
DEVINDER PAUL SINGH SANDHU
                                                                 . . . . Petitioner
                                       Vs.

PR. CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NWR AND ORS
                                                              . . . . Respondents
                               ****
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
                               ****
Present: Ms. Vralika Bassi, Advocate
         for the petitioner.
         Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel
         for the respondents/Revenue.
                                ****
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)

CM-15682-CWP CWP-2024

Application for preponement of date of hearing of the main case

is allowed. Main case is taken on board for today itself.

CM-15683-CWP CWP-2024

Application for placing on record Annexure A A-1 to A-4 4 is

allowed.

Registry to place the same at appropriate place.

Main case

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the

petitioner can be disposed of in terms of judgment passed by the

1 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:128098-DB

CWP-12964-2024 2024 (O&M)

Coordinate Bench in CWP-15745-2024, CWP 2024, titled as Jatinder Singh

Bhangu vs. Union of India and others, decided on 19.07.2024. Learn Learned ed

counsel submits that he does not press the other grounds in the present

petition petition.

2. Learned counsel for the revenue submits that the writ petition preferred

by the petitioner does not essentially raise the said grounds which were

examined by the Coordinate Coordinat Bench.

3. However, we find that the petitioner was served a notice under Section

148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Jurisdictional Assessing

Officer during the faceless regime.

4. In CWP-21509-2023 CWP 2023 and other bunch of petitions, we have also

concurred with the judgment passed by the Coordinate Bench in CWP CWP--

15745-2024 2024 (supra) and held as under:-

under:-

"18.

18. Keeping in view the law laid down by the Coordinate Bench (supra), notices issued by the JAO under Section 148 of the Act, 1961 and the proceedings initiated thereafter without conducting the faceless assessment as envisaged under Section 144B of the Act, 1961, have been found to be contrary to the provisions of the Act, 1961 and accordingly notices dated 28.02.2023, 16.03.2023, 20.03.2024 and 30.03.2023 and order order dated 30.03.2023, are set aside for want of jurisdiction.

19. The respondents-revenue revenue would be, however, at liberty to follow the procedure as laid down under the Act, 1961 and proceed accordingly, if so advised.

2 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:128098-DB

CWP-12964-2024 2024 (O&M)

20. All the writ petitions are allowed. The interim order passed by the Court shall stand merged with the present order."

5. In view thereof, the writ petition is allowed and notice dated

31.03.2024 .03.2024 is set aside. The observations and order passed above shall

apply mutatis mutandis to the present case. However, the respondents respondents--

revenue would be, however, at liberty to follow the procedure as laid

down under the Act, 1961 and proceed accordingly, if so advised.

6. All pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly.

(SANJEEV SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE

(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE September 26, 2024 Mohit goyal

1. Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No

2. Whether reportable? Yes/No

3 of 3

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter