Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 16535 P&H
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:117543
CWP No. 22758 of 2024
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(134) CWP No. 22758 of 2024
Date of Decision : 09.09.2024
Pushpa Kataria
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Present: Mr. Nitesh Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
***
Harsimran Singh Sethi J. (Oral)
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is
entitled for a particular pay scale keeping in view the judgment of this Court
passed in CWP No. 3931 of 1992 titled as Baldev Raj Mittal and others Vs.
State of Punjab and others, decided on 15.04.2009 and other connected
cases, which benefit is not being extended to the petitioner, which is causing
prejudice to her.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has
already raised the said grievance in the legal notice dated 15.06.2024
(Annexure P-11) but the same is still pending consideration with the
respondents and the petitioner will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a
direction is issued to the respondents to decide the same by passing an
appropriate speaking order in a time bound manner.
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:117543
3. Notice of motion.
4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, Deputy
Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf
of the respondent-State and submits that in case, the legal notice dated
15.06.2024 (Annexure P-11) has been received in the office of the concerned
authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities
concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority within a
period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of certified copy of this
order by passing an appropriate speaking order. Learned counsel further
submits that in case, it is found feasible to accept the claim of the petitioner,
the same will be accepted, otherwise due reasons will be mentioned for not
accepting the claim of the petitioner in the speaking order to be passed and
the said order will be duly conveyed to the petitioner.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view
the statement of learned State counsel, the present petition may kindly be
disposed of having been not pressed any further.
6. Ordered accordingly.
September 09, 2024 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI)
kanchan JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes
Whether reportable : No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!