Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Krishan Kumar And Anr vs State Of Haryana And Ors
2024 Latest Caselaw 16249 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 16249 P&H
Judgement Date : 4 September, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Krishan Kumar And Anr vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 4 September, 2024

                 CWP-19489-2024 and connected matter                                                  -1-
                 With CWP-20907-2024

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                                   AT CHANDIGARH


                 113(2 cases) &                                        CWP-19489-2024
                 117                                                   Date of Decision: 04.09.2024

                 Krishan Kumar and another                                            ...Petitioner(s)


                                                              Versus


                 State of Haryana and others                                        ...Respondent(s)

                                                               With
                                                                       CWP-20566-2024
                 Mamta                                                               ...Petitioner(s)

                                                              Versus

                 State of Haryana and others                                         ...Respondent(s)
                                                               And
                                                                        CWP-20907-2024
                 Harsawroop                                                           ...Petitioner(s)

                                                              Versus

                 State of Haryana and others                                         ...Respondent(s)


                 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA

                 Present:-              Mr. Jasbir Mor, Advocate and Mr. Rajat Mor, Advocate for the
                                        petitioners

                                        Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana

                                        ***
                 TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)

The aforementioned three petitions are being decided together as

common questions of law on similar facts arise for adjudication therein. The

2024.09.10 11:56 grievance raised by the petitioners is that they have been offered appointments

authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-19489-2024 and connected matter -2- With CWP-20907-2024

in Mewat cadre, ignoring their merit and preference(s) for Rest of Haryana

cadre which is arbitrary and illegal.

2. The petitioners were applicants for the post of TGT Sanskrit

pursuant to advertisement no.2 of 2023, Annexure P-1, under different

unreserved/reserved categories for Mewat as well as Rest of Haryana cadre. (In

CWP 19489-2024 the petitioners belong to BC-A and BC-B category; in CWP-

20566-2024 to EWS category; and in CWP-20907-2024 to General category.)

A common written test was conducted for both the cadres. They were successful

in the selection and, at the time of scrutiny of documents, were asked to give

preference for the respective cadre(s) they wished to be considered against for

selection and appointment. All of them opted for Rest of Haryana cadre as their

first preference. As per final selection result, they have secured more marks

than those of the last selected candidate(s) in Rest of Haryana cadre, still the

appointments have been offered to them in Mewat cadre.

2. Pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court, learned State

counsel has produced the petitioners' result as well as scrutiny forms, a perusal

whereof shows that all the petitioners have secured more marks than those of

the last selected candidates in their respective categories, and have opted for

Rest of Haryana cadre as first preference. In view of these undisputed facts, it

appears that due to an error or mistake on the respondents' part the petitioners

have been allocated Mewat cadre instead of Rest of Haryana, which they are

entitled to as per the preference given, as also on merit.

3. Accordingly, the petitions stand disposed of with a direction to the

Commission to correct the error/mistake, and recommend the petitioners for

appointment as TGTs Sanskrit in Rest of Haryana cadre in their respective

authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-19489-2024 and connected matter -3- With CWP-20907-2024

categories as per merit. The second respondent shall, thereupon, offer

appointment(s) to the petitioners, subject to their fulfilling the requisite

conditions, from the date other selected candidates pursuant to the selection in

question have been appointed. The directions shall be carried out by the

respondents within a period of four weeks from receiving a certified copy of

the order.

4. A photocopy of this order be placed on connected files.





                                                                           (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
                                                                                  JUDGE
                 04.09.2024
                 Payal
                                        Whether speaking/reasoned         Yes/No
                                        Whether reportable                Yes/No







authenticity of this order/judgment

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter