Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18751 P&H
Judgement Date : 22 October, 2024
CWP-28606-2024 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
134 CWP-28606-2024
Date of Decision: 22.10.2024
Ram Niwas ...Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present:- Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Bhar, Advocate for the petitioner
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)
The petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of mandamus
directing the respondents to release the excess amount of ₹1,41,760 deducted
from the gratuity along with interest; and also the amount of ₹29,396 along with
interest which the petitioner was forced to deposit due to wrong calculation by
the respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance raised
herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage,
the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent No.2 is directed to decide the
pending representation, dated 19.08.2024, Annexure P-16, in a specified period.
He also contends that the petitioner will make separate representation to the
respondents concerning his claim for removing anomaly in Grade Pay, and
liberty may be granted for the purpose.
3. Notice of motion.
authenticity of this order/judgment
4. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice and submits
that the pending representation shall be decided by respondent No.2
expeditiously.
5. In view thereof, without going into merits of the case, the petition
is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/Director Secondary
Education, to consider and decide the pending representation, dated
19.08.2024, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period
of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. In case
the petitioner is found entitled to the benefits claimed, the same shall be released
to him within a period of six weeks therefrom. Further, the petitioner shall be
at liberty to make a separate representation to the respondents concerning his
claim for the Grade Pay or any other related issue.
6. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the
officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
JUDGE
22.10.2024
Payal
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No
authenticity of this order/judgment
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!