Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 20288 P&H
Judgement Date : 14 November, 2024
ae i : rang ee et F084: PHHC4149075-D8 SES IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 126 CWP-30756-2024 Decided on : 14.11.2024 M/s Nem Kumar-Tarsem Chand (JV) ... Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Punjab and others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Girdhar, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. AG, Punjab. 3 2k 24g ok SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral)
Admittedly, an arbitration clause addressed between the parties. The petitioner being a contractor can avail the provision of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Keeping in view the arbitration clause, we would not exercise our discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Dismissed with the aforesaid liberty.
Misc. application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA)
JUDGE (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE November 14, 2024 Lavisha
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
authenticity of this order/judgment
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!