Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19934 P&H
Judgement Date : 11 November, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:146653
CR-6564-2024 (O&M) [1]
138
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CR-6564-2024 (O&M)
Date of decision: 11.11.2024
Sabneet Singh ...Petitioner
Versus
Rajesh Kumar ...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
Present: Mr. Vishavjeet Singh Rishi, Advocate for the petitioner.
****
VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
1. Challenge in the present revision petition is to the judgment
dated 03.10.2018 passed by the Rent Controller, Jalandhar in the Rent Case
No.144 of 2014 vide which eviction petition filed by the respondent has
been allowed. Challenge is also to the judgment dated 31.08.2024 passed by
the Appellate Authority, Jalandhar in Rent Appeal No.138 of 2018 wherein
the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed by the Appellate
Authority.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, during the course of
arguments, has submitted that the petitioner would withdraw the present
revision petition but has sought time to vacate the premises and to shift to
another premises. It has been stated that the petitioner is a tenant in the
premises since 2013.
3. Keeping in view the abovesaid facts and circumstances and the
limited prayer made by the petitioner, the present revision petition is
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:146653
CR-6564-2024 (O&M) [2]
dismissed as withdrawn with following directions:-
i) The petitioner would vacate the premises and would hand
over the keys of the premises to the respondent on or
before 11.04.2025.
ii) The petitioner would pay an amount of Rs.10,000/- per
month from the month of November, 2024 up to the period
the petitioner stays in occupation, on or before 21st of every
month.
iii) The petitioner would pay the arrears of rent/mesne profits
within a period of five months from today.
iv) The petitioner would file an undertaking on the said three
aspects before the Executing Court within a period of three
weeks from today with an advance copy to counsel for the
landlord in the Executing Court.
4. It is made clear that in case the petitioner does not submit the
said undertaking or does not comply with any of the abovesaid conditions
then it would be open to the respondent to seek immediate possession of the
premises in question from the petitioner by applying for police help in
addition to taking recourse to other proceedings including the Contempt of
Courts Act.
5. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
disposed of in view of the abovesaid order.
11.11.2024 (VIKAS BAHL)
Pawan JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No
Whether reportable:- Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!