Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19595 P&H
Judgement Date : 6 November, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:144613
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
125
CWP No. 29973 of 2024 (O&M)
DECIDED ON: 06th November, 2024
Sukhchain Singh and others
.....PETITIONERs
VERSUS
State of Punjab and others
.....RESPONDENTs
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Present: Mr. P.K. Saini, Advocate for petitioners.
Mr. A.S. Bains, AAG Punjab.
***
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J (ORAL)
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance
which has been raised by the petitioners has already been decided by this
Court while passing order in CWP No. 15896 of 2023, decided on 13.9.2024
titled as 'Saurabh Sharma and others Versus State of Punjab and another',
hence, the respondents are under obligation to decide the case of the
petitioners in the light of the judgment in Saurabh Sharma's case (supra).
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the
petitioners have already filed a representation raising the grievance as raised
in the present petition vide representation dated 16.10.2024, (Annexure P-21)
which is still pending consideration with the respondents and the petitioners
will be satisfied at this stage in case a time bound direction is issued to the
respondents to decide the said legal notice by passing an appropriate
speaking order.
3. Notice of motion.
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:144613
4. Mr. A.S. Bains, AAG Punjab, who is present in the Court,
accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
5. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in case the
legal notice dated 16.10.2024 (Annexure P-21) has been received in the
office of the concerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration
with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent
authority in the light of Saurabh Sharma's case (supra) within a period of
eight weeks from the date of the receipt of certified copy of this order by
passing an appropriate speaking order and in case, after the decision any
relief is to be extended to the petitioner, the same will be extended, otherwise
due reasons will be mentioned in the speaking order to be passed for not
accepting the claim of the petitioner for his information and necessary action.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view
the statement of learned State counsel, the present writ petition may kindly be
disposed of having been not pressed any further.
7. Ordered accordingly.
( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) th 06 November, 2024 JUDGE reema
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!