Wednesday, 03, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sahil vs State Of Punjab
2024 Latest Caselaw 6210 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6210 P&H
Judgement Date : 19 March, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Sahil vs State Of Punjab on 19 March, 2024

Author: Pankaj Jain

Bench: Pankaj Jain

                                      Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:039353




CRM-M-13021 of 2024                       1                2024:PHHC:039353

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                        CHANDIGARH

234                                       CRM-M-13021 of 2024
                                          Date of Decision:19.03.2024


Sahil


                                                                     ....Petitioner
                                      Versus


State of Punjab
                                                                 .....Respondents


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
             ****

Present:     Mr. Satnam Singh Thakur, Advocate,
             for the petitioner.

             Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr. DAG, Punjab

             ****

PANKAN JAIN, J. (Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 439 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in

FIR No.145 dated 12.07.2023, registered under Section 21-C/29/61/85 of the

NDPS Act and 25-54-59 of the Arms Act, at Police Station Division Number

8, District Jalandhar.

2. One Saurav Kumar was apprehended on the basis of suspicion

by the police party. Upon his search, 510 grams of heroin was recovered

alongwith one country made pistol of 32 bore and 5 live cartridges. It is

claimed that during the course of investigation, Saurav Kumar suffered

1 of 4

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:039353

CRM-M-13021 of 2024 2 2024:PHHC:039353

disclosure statement claiming that the heroin was given to him by the present

petitioner i.e. Sahil and one Deepu.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is

behind the bars more than 8 months and 6 days and has clean antecedents. He

further submits that the challan already stands presented and most of the

witnesses are official witnesses and thus there is no apprehension that they

shall temper with the evidence. He further relies a judgment of the Supreme

Court in Tofan Singh versus State of Tamil Nadu 2021 (1) RCR (Criminal)

1 to submit that the disclosure statement made by a co-accused while he was

in police custody alone does not derive to bring home the guilt of the

accused.

4. Custody Certificate of the petitioner has been filed today in

Court. The same is taken on record.

5. State Counsel is not in position to dispute the factual assertions

made by counsel for the petitioner based on record.

6. Without commenting on the merits of the case and the fact that the

investigation already stands concluded and Challan stands presented, the present

petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his

furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Duty

Magistrate concerned.

7. However, in addition to conditions that may be imposed by the

Trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned, the petitioner shall remain bound by

the following conditions :-

(i) The petitioner shall not mis-use the liberty granted.

2 of 4

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:039353

CRM-M-13021 of 2024 3 2024:PHHC:039353

(ii) The petitioner shall not tamper with any evidence oral or

documentary during the trial.

(iii) The petitioner shall not absent himself on any date before

the trial.

(iv) The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

(v) The petitioner shall deposit his passport, if any with the trial

Court.

(vi) The petitioner shall give his cellphone number to the police

authorities and shall not change his cell-phone number without

permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The petitioner shall not in any manner try to delay the trial.

8. In case of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions and those

which may be imposed by the Trial Court, the prosecution shall be at liberty

to move cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

9. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.





                                                         (PANKAN JAIN)
                                                             JUDGE

March 19, 2024
dinesh
                    Whether speaking                 :         Yes
                    Whether reportable               :         No




                                    3 of 4

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:039353

CRM-M-13021 of 2024 4 2024:PHHC:039353

4 of 4

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter