Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6087 P&H
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2024
2024:PHHC:038067
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
143
CWP-6402-2024
Date of decision: 18.03.2024
Meena Kaur and others ...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab ...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
*****
Present : Ms. Ayushi Panwar, Advocate for Mr. Chahit Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Bains, AAG, Punjab.
***** AMAN CHAUDHARY. J.
1. The prayer in the present Civil Writ Petition filed under Articles
226/227 of the Constitution of India, is to issue a writ in the nature of
mandamus, for directing the respondent authorities to provide the petitioners
the report of the inquiry conducted by State Cyber Crime Cell, Punjab and to
quash the entire selection process.
2. On being confronted with the judgment wherein the same prayer
had made as in the present case, it being CWP-22330-2023 which was
dismissed on 05.10.2023, learned counsel for the petitioners, accepts that she
was aware of the said decision and has gone through the same as well, but is
unable to explain the reason of not mentioning the said fact in her petition, even
though it was filed by a separate set of petitioners. She, thus prays for
withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to pursue the remedies available,
before the department.
3. Ordered accordingly.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 18.03.2024 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
integrity of this order/judgment
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!