Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5950 P&H
Judgement Date : 15 March, 2024
2024:PHHC: 037585
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
256 CRM-M-7067-2024
Date of decision: 15.03.2024
DEEPAK AND ANR .... PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present: Mr. Vikas Lochab, Advocate
for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Rajiv Goel, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Arvind K. Yadav, Advocate
for respondent No.2.
****
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral)
The prayer in this petition is for quashing of an FIR No.0475
dated 05.07.2023 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 406, 420 of the
IPC, 1860 at Police Station City Narnaul, District Mahendergarh (Annexure
P-1) along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis
of a compromise arrived at between the petitioners and respondent No.2.
Vide order dated 09.02.2024 this Court had directed the parties
to appear before Illaqa Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with
regard to the compromise dated 23.01.2024 (Annexure P-2).
The Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court was to submit a report in this
regard giving certain details as enumerated in the said order.
Pursuant to the order dated 09.02.2024 passed by this Court, the
parties have appeared before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Narnaul
authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD
and as per the report dated 11.03.2024 submitted to this Court, both the
parties have got recorded their respective statements in Court.
A perusal of the aforesaid report would show that the parties
have effected a genuine compromise without there being any pressure,
coercion or undue influence. In view of the compromise there is a remote
possibility of the complaint coming forward to support the prosecution case.
The powers under Section 482 Cr.PC can be exercised in such like situation
in order to prevent unnecessary vagaries of criminal trial to be faced by the
parties, when there are remote chances of conviction of the accused. The
compromise in question is found to be fully in consonance with the direction
issued by the Court in "Kulwinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab
2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr.,
2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543".
In view of the aforesaid report of the learned Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Narnaul accompanied by statements of both the parties, the FIR
No.0475 dated 05.07.2023 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 406,
420 of the IPC, 1860 at Police Station City Narnaul, District Mahendergarh
(Annexure P-1) along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom
are hereby quashed qua the petitioners.
Petition stands disposed of.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI)
JUDGE
15.03.2024
Kusum
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
authenticity of this order/judgment
Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!