Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd And ... vs Rajit Singh And Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 10787 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10787 P&H
Judgement Date : 4 July, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd And ... vs Rajit Singh And Others on 4 July, 2024

Bench: G.S. Sandhawalia, Vikas Bahl

                                 Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:083003-DB




RA-LP-53-2019
         2019 in LPA-813-2017
                 LPA     2017 ( O&M ) and connected matters                 -1-

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                         AT CHANDIGARH

(1)   CM-4456
         4456-LPA-2019 in/and RA-LP-53
                                    53-2019 ( O&M ) in LPA-813-201
                                                               2017

Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and others
                                                .......Applicants/Appellant
                                                              Appellants
                              Versus
Ranjit Singh and others
                                                        .... Respondents

(2)        CM
           CM-970-LPA-2023 in/and RA-LP
                                     LP-9-2023 ( O&M ) in LPA-817-2017
                                                                  2017

Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and others
                                                .......Applicants/Appellants
                              Versus
Harmesh Kumar and others
                                                        .... Respondents

(3)     CM
        CM-981-LPA-2023 in/and RA-LP-10
                                     10-2023 ( O&M ) in LPA-815-2017
                                                                2017

Punjab State Power Corporation Limited and others
                                                .......Applicants/Appellants
                                                                   lants
                              Versus
Madan Lal and others
                                                        .... Respondents

                            Date of decision : 04.07.2024

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL


Present:      Mr. Vishal Chaudhri, Advocate,
              for the applicants-appellants.
                            ****

G.S. SANDHAWALIA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ( Oral )

CM-4456-LPA
        LPA-2019 in RA-LP-93-2019
CM-970-LPA
       LPA-2023 in RA-LP-9-2023
CM-981-LPA
       LPA-2023 in RA-LP-10-2023

              For the reasons stated in the application
                                            applications, duly supported
                                                                   orted by

separate affidavits,
         affidavits the delay in filing the appe
                                            appeals is condoned.

              Applications are, accordingly, allowed.

                                    1 of 7
               ::: Downloaded on - 21-07-2024 16:34:31 :::
                                  Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:083003-DB




RA-LP-53-2019
         2019 in LPA-813-2017
                 LPA     2017 ( O&M ) and connected matters                 -2-

RA-LP-53--2019 ( O&M ) in LPA-813-2017
                                  2017
RA-LP-9-2023
        2023 ( O&M ) in LPA-817-2017
                         LPA     2017
RA-LP-10--2023 ( O&M ) in LPA-815-2017
                                  2017

1.            These review applications ha
                                        have been filed by the appellant

Corporation seeking review of the order dated 14.05.2019 passed by the then

Co-ordinate
   ordinate Bench dismissing LPAs No. 813, 815 and 817 of 2017.

2.            The review of the order dated 14.05.2019 is being sought on

account of the fact that the said order had bbeen
                                              een challenged by the applicant

Corporation before the Apex Court by way of Special Leave Petition (Civil)

Diary No. 33033/2019, which was dismissed vide order dated 21.10.2019.

However, reference was made to a notification dated 19.06.2013, whereby

certain powers were conferred on the applicant Corporation under the

Telegraph Act, which if taken into account, would cure the problem of prior

approval of government. The Apex Court noticed that this point was never
                                                                   ne

argued before the Division Bench and therefore, the applicant Corporation was
                                                                          w

granted liberty to file review petition, which if filed within two weeks, was

ordered to be disposed of on merits. The order of the Apex Court reads as

under :-

                      "Delay condoned.
                      We see no reason to interfere with the impugned
           judgment(s) of the High Court. The Special Leave
           Petition(s) is/are, accordingly, dismissed.
                      However, learned counsel appearing on behalf of
           the petitioners points out that vide a notification 19.06.2013
           certain powers are conferred on the petitioners under the
           Telegraph Act, which if taken into account, would cure the
           problem of prior approval of government. Since we find that
           this point has not been argued before the Division Bench,
           the petitioners
               petitioners may file a review petition before the High


                                    2 of 7
               ::: Downloaded on - 21-07-2024 16:34:31 :::
                                  Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:083003-DB




RA-LP-53-2019
         2019 in LPA-813-2017
                 LPA     2017 ( O&M ) and connected matters                 -3-

           Court, which, if filed within two weeks from today, will be
           disposed of on merits.
                      Pending application stand disposed of.
                                                         of."

3.            It is pertinent to notice that the writ petitions were filed by the

land owners
     owners challenging the notification dated 30.05.2014, whereby there was

proposal to undertake the scheme/transmission works at route plan of 66 KV

Electric line from 66 KV Sub Station, Chabbewal to 66 KV Sub Station,

Sadhu Ashram. The lands
                  land of the writ petition
                                   petitioners apparently fall in villages

Chagran and Bajwara, District Hoshiarpur,
                              Hoshiarpur, which were adversely effected
                                                               effected.. The

writ petitioners were owners in possession of land measuring 5 kanals 16

marlas, situated in village Chagran; 2450 square feet situated in village

Bajrwara; and 32 kanals 14 marlas, situated in village Bajwara. The ground as

such was raised that the notification in question did not mention any direction,

name of village or any khasra number of the land in which the electric towers

were to be installed
           installed for the purpose of the said route and, therefore, the writ

petitioners were not granted opportunity to file any objection or representation

to the authorities.

4.            The learned Single Judge took notice of this factual aspect while

re-producing
   producing the route plan which was duly mentioned in the notification dated

30.05.2014, which was subject-matter
                      subject        of challenge. It is pertinent to notice that

in the notification itself,
                    itself reference was made to the notification dated

19.06.2013, whereby the powers of Telegraph Authority under Part III of the

Indian Telegraph Act have been vested with the applicant Corporation.

5.            Learned counsel for the review applicants
                                             applicants, thus, has referred
                                                                        red to

the notification dated 19.06.2013,
                       19.06.2013, whereby the Government of Punjab,

Department of Power (Energy Branch) in exercise of the powers of the

                                    3 of 7
               ::: Downloaded on - 21-07-2024 16:34:31 :::
                                  Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:083003-DB




RA-LP-53-2019
         2019 in LPA-813-2017
                 LPA     2017 ( O&M ) and connected matters                     -4-

Telegraph
 elegraph Authority
           uthority under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 has bestowed the

same on the applicant Corporation in view of Section 164 of the Electricity

Act, 2003. However, in addition, the condition as such was the requirement of

giving two months' notice by the applicant Corporation in the Official Gazette

and in two newspapers for seeking objections and suggestions
                                                 suggestions.. The said

notification reads as under :-

                 "PUNJAB
                  PUNJAB GOVT. GAZ. (EXTRA), JUNE 19, 2013
                           (JYST 29, 1935 SAKA)

                            GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

                            DEPARTMENT OF POWER
                              (ENERGY BRANCH)

                                              ORDER

The 19th June, 2013

No. S.O. 46/C.A. 36/2003/S.164/2013. - WHEREAS the Punjab State Power Corporation Limited having its registered office at Punjab State Electricity Board, Head Office Building, Mall Road, Patiala, is a Punjab Government Undertaking registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is a deemed distribution licens licensee under section 14 of the Electricity Act, 2003 and is a State Power Utility, as notified by the Punjab Government under section 39 of the said Act;

WHEREAS the said Corporation is engaged in the business of power distribution through 66 KV transmission lines in the State of Punjab;

WHEREAS for placing and maintaining electric lines, electrical plant, cable, chambers, towers and posts under, over, along or across, in or upon any immovable property for transmission of electricity or for the purpose of telephonic elephonic communications necessary for proper co co-

ordination of works, the vesting and exercise of the powers

4 of 7

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:083003-DB

RA-LP-53-2019 2019 in LPA-813-2017 LPA 2017 ( O&M ) and connected matters -5-

of the telegraph authority under Part Part-III of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 (Central Act No. 13 of 1885), are required to be conferred on the said Corporation;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (Central Act No. 36 of 2003), and all other powers enabling him in this behalf, the Governor of Punjab is pleased to confer upon the said Corporation, Corporation, all powers vested in the telegraph authority under Part-III Part III of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, in respect of the electrical lines and electrical plant, established or maintained for the transmission of electricity or for the purpose of telephonic or telegraphic communication necessary for the proper co co-ordination of the works, subject to the following conditions, namely ::-

CONDITIONS

1. That the said Corporation shall cause power transmission system notified, which shall contain the estimates of the capital expenditure, salient features of such transmission system, and the benefits that may accrue therefrom;

2. That the said Corporation shall give two months' notice in the Official Gazette and in two newspapers (one in English and one in Punjabi), Punjabi), for seeking objections and suggestions from the persons concerned, which will be duly considered by the Corporation; and considered

3. That the powers conferred upon the said Corporation, shall be subject to the other relevant provisions of the aforesaid Electrici Electricity Act, 2003.

ANIRIDHU TEWARI SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, DEPARTMENT OF POWER"

The he learned Single Judge came to the conclusion that there was no mention

regarding the khasra numbers and therefore, the effected person(s) could not

5 of 7

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:083003-DB

RA-LP-53-2019 2019 in LPA-813-2017 LPA 2017 ( O&M ) and connected matters -6-

file any objection as such, apart from commenting on merits that the route plan

was in zigzag manner. A passing reference was made apparently that approval

of the Government is wanting. Rather, it was specifically mentioned that

nothing prevented the applicant applicant Corporation to show the khasra numbers of

the property to enable the effected persons to file the objections and actually

implement the scheme in its letter and spirit. Had the same been done, the

effected persons could have raised the objections. In such circumstances, the

notification was quashed and it was directed that fresh notification be done in

accordance with the provisions of the aforementioned Act and to take the prior

approval of the Government.

6. Thus, we are of the considered opinion tthat hat while upholding the

order of the learned Single Judge as such, this aspect was not taken into

consideration by the then Co-ordinate Co ordinate Bench. The landowner's counsel had put

in appearance on an earlier occasion but thereafter took the plea that the files

had been returned to the client, who is appare apparently residing abroad.

7. Accordingly, the review applications are partly allowed to the

extent that in view of the notification dated 19.06.2023 re-produced produced above, above

power having already been conferred upon the applicant nt Corporation, the

observation that the prior approval of the Government is to be taken is without

any basis. However, itt is open to the applicant Corporation as such to issue

fresh publication in accordance with condition (2) as noticed above and by

giving necessary details of the khasra numbers, which would be directly

affected by the laying of the line, so that necessary objections can be received

from the concerned land owners regarding the line in question, which can be

then decided by by the competent authority in accordance with law regarding the

6 of 7

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:083003-DB

RA-LP-53-2019 2019 in LPA-813-2017 LPA 2017 ( O&M ) and connected matters -7-

loss and damage, if any, to be caused to the land falling under the High

Tension Wires.

Wires. Liberty is, thus, given to the applicant Corporation to

undertake the said exercise afresh by giving nece necessary ssary details of the land over

which lines are liable to pass.

8. Needless to say that if certain set of persons have already received

their due compensation and have not objected on earlier occasion, then the said

persons would not be required to be re re-heard eard in pursuance of the fresh

notification, which would only be qua the successful writ petitioners.

9. All the pending applications stand disposed of.

( G.S. SANDHAWALIA ) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

( VIKAS BAHL ) JUDGE July 04, 2024 ndj

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No

7 of 7

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter