Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 905 P&H
Judgement Date : 16 January, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:005643
307 2024:PHHC:005643
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-35041-2023
Date of decision :16.01.2024
SHASHI KUMAR ALIAS LUCKY
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present: Mr. M.K. Bhatnagar, Advocate
for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, Asstt. A.G., Punjab.
Mr. S.K. Bawa, Advocate
for respondent No.2.
****
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL)
The prayer in this petition is for quashing of an FIR No.100
dated 08.05.2021 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 420, 406, 34
IPC and Section 24 of Immigration Act at Police Station Tanda, District
Hoshiarpur along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom
on the basis of a compromise arrived at between the petitioner and
respondent no.2.
Vide order dated 24.07.2023 this Court had directed the
parties to appear before Illaqa Magistrate for getting their statements
recorded with regard to the compromise dated 28.06.2023 (P-2).
The Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court was to submit a report in
this regard giving certain details as enumerated in the said order.
Pursuant to the order dated 24.07.2023 passed by this
Court, the parties have appeared before the Chief Judicial Magistrate-
cum-Secretary, DLSA, Hoshiarpur and as per the report dated
1 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:005643
2024:PHHC:005643
16.11.2023 submitted to this Court, both the parties have got recorded
their respective statements in Court.
A perusal of the aforesaid report would show that the parties
have effected a genuine compromise without there being any pressure,
coercion or undue influence. In view of the compromise there is a
remote possibility of the complainant coming forward to support the
prosecution case. The powers under Section 482 Cr.PC can be exercised
in such like situation in order to prevent unnecessary vagaries of
criminal trial to be faced by the parties, when there are remote chances
of conviction of the accused. The compromise in question is found to be
fully in consonance with the direction issued by the Court in
"Kulwinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal)
1052 and Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.)
543".
Further, the learned counsel for the petitioner, while placing
reliance upon the judgments passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Jayrajsinh Digvijaysinh Rana Versus State of Gujarat and another,
2012(4) R.C.R. (Criminal) 589 and this Court in Joginder Singh &
another Vs. State of Punjab and another, CRM-M-23739-2010
decided on 27.04.2011, Rajinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab &
another, CRM-M-37395-2016 decided on 16.05.2017, Bhoj Raj Vs.
State of Punjab & another, CRM-24945-2019 decided on 27.09.2019
and Vimal Kalra & others Versus State of Punjab & another, CRM-
M-20355-2022, decided on 25.07.2022 submits that partial quashing of
the FIR was possible on the basis of a compromise.
2 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:005643
2024:PHHC:005643
In view of the aforesaid report of the Chief Judicial
Magistrate-cum-Secretary, DLSA, Hoshiarpur accompanied by
statements of both the parties, the FIR No.100 dated 08.05.2021
(Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 420, 406, 34 IPC and Section
24 of Immigration Act at Police Station Tanda, District Hoshiarpur along
with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed
qua the petitioner.
Petition stands disposed of.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 16.01.2024 JITESH
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:005643
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!