Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ram Pal Singh vs T.V.S.N. Prasad Ias
2024 Latest Caselaw 774 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 774 P&H
Judgement Date : 15 January, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Ram Pal Singh vs T.V.S.N. Prasad Ias on 15 January, 2024

Author: Rajbir Sehrawat

Bench: Rajbir Sehrawat

                                                        Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:004834




                                         2024:PHHC:004834
249          IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                      AT CHANDIGARH

                                                  COCP No.2799 of 2023 (O&M)
                                                  Date of Decision: 15.01.2024

Ram Pal Singh                                                            .....Petitioner
                                         Versus
T.V.S.N. Prasad                                                   ........Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJBIR SEHRAWAT

Present:     Mr. Shivam Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.

             Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana.


RAJBIR SEHRAWAT, J. (ORAL)

1. This is a contempt petition filed under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India against the respondent for violating the direction issued vide judgment dated 22.09.2022 (Annexure P-1) passed by this Court in CWP- 21873-2022.

2. Compliance report by way of affidavit of the respondent has been filed by learned State counsel today in the Court. The same is taken on record. Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the order dated 22.09.2022 passed by this Court in CWP-21873-2022 has been complied with and order dated 05.01.2024 has been passed, vide which, representation of the petitioner has been filed being devoid of merits.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the same.

4. In view of the above, the present petition is rendered infructuous and dismissed, as such.

5. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail any other alternate remedy, but in accordance with law, if he feels aggrieved of the order passed by the respondent.



                                                      (RAJBIR SEHRAWAT)
15.01.2024                                                 JUDGE
sandeep
                    Whether Speaking/Reasoned     :      Yes/No
                    Whether Reportable            :      Yes/No

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:004834

1 of 1

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter