Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Arvind Kumar Alias Arvind Kumar ... vs State Of Punjab
2024 Latest Caselaw 625 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 625 P&H
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Arvind Kumar Alias Arvind Kumar ... vs State Of Punjab on 11 January, 2024

Author: Vikas Suri

Bench: Vikas Suri

                                                                         Neutral Citation No:=




                                                                  2024:PHHC:003207

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                     AT CHANDIGARH
225
                                                     CRM-M-29196-2023
                                                     Date of Decision: 11.01.2024
Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Kumar Chaudhary
                                                                            ...Petitioner

                                          Versus
State of Punjab
                                                                         ...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI

Present:-   Mr. Dinesh Mahajan, Advocate,
            for the petitioner.

            Mr. Rohit Arya, DAG, Punjab.

                   *****

VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral)

1. This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of

order dated 26.02.2018 (Annexure P-5) passed in case FIR No.40 dated

06.09.2016, under Section 25 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station GRP

Pathankot, District Pathankot.

2. Vide order dated 22.09.2023, petitioner was directed to deposit

an amount of `5,000/- as costs and surrender before the trial Court within a

period of two weeks. The operative part of the said order reads as thus:-

"Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia submits that the proclamation is not as per the mandate of Section 82 Cr.P.C. He refers to the interlocutory order dated 25.01.2018, wherein statement of serving official has been reproduced. It is contended that the proclamation was ordered to be issued for 25.01.2018 and the conceded case is that

1 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=

CRM-M-29196-2023 -2- 2024:PHHC:003207

the publication was made on 19.01.2018 and thus, condition of mandatory period of 30 days is not fulfilled. Referring to discharge summary (Annexure P-6) from Jawarhar Lal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Neurosurgery Department, it is further submitted that the petitioner belongs to another State, where he suffered head injury on account of an assault on him and had remained admitted to hospital as well. It is further submitted that the petitioner was young boy of 20 years at the time of alleged occurrence, who had come to the State of Punjab to earn his livelihood and does not have a stable or strong financial means. The petitioner is keen to join proceedings once again and face trial.

Notice of motion.

Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and waives service. He seeks time to file reply/status report.

In the meanwhile, petitioner is directed to deposit an amount of Rs.5,000/- as costs with 'Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association Benevolent Fund' and surrender before the trial Court concerned within a period of two weeks from today. In case the petitioner surrenders before the trial Court and moves an appropriate application for bail along with receipt of above said costs, he be enlarged on interim bail subject to his furnishing bail-bond and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

To enable the petitioner to put in appearance before the Court below, his arrest pursuant to the impugned proceedings shall remain stayed till

2 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=

CRM-M-29196-2023 -3- 2024:PHHC:003207

05.10.2023.

Needless to observe that in case the petitioner fails to comply with the above said direction, the protection granted herein shall cease to exist."

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the costs have

been deposited against receipt dated 28.09.2023 and the petitioner has

surrendered before the trial Court in compliance of the aforesaid order

passed by this Court. During the pendency of the present petition, vide

judgment dated 03.11.2023, petitioner has been convicted and sentenced to

undergo imprisonment for the period already undergone by him. It is

submitted that in view of the same, the present petition has served its

purpose and the same has been rendered infructuous. It is prayed that the

same be disposed of as such.

Learned State counsel does not dispute the submissions made

by learned counsel for the petitioner and passing of judgment dated

03.11.2023 noticed above.

In the light of the above, the present petition is disposed of as

having been rendered infructuous.





                                                    ( VIKAS SURI )
January 11, 2024                                        JUDGE
harish



         Whether speaking/reasoned         Yes/No

         Whether reportable                Yes/No




                                                                  Neutral Citation No:=

                               3 of 3

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter