Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1790 P&H
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:010618-DB
2024:PHHC:010618-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
246
CWP-25962-2022(O&M)
Date of decision: 25.01.2024
SANJEEV KUMAR AND OTHERS
...... Petitioners
V/S
FULLERTON INDIA CREDIT CO LTD
..... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI
Present: Mr. Mayank Garg, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Kartik Khicher, Advocate for respondents.
****
LISA GILL, J.(Oral)
1. Prayer in this writ petition is for quashing demand notice dated
22.03.2022 (Annexure P-8) issued under Section 13(2) of Securitization
and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security
Interest Act (SARFAESI Act), 2002 Act and notice dated 29.07.2022 issued
under Section 13(4) of SARFAESI Act. It is prayed that physical
possession of secured asset be not taken by Financial Institution.
2. Availing of financial credit from respondent-Financial
Institution, financial indiscipline on the part of respondent, for reasons as
may and subsequent initiation of proceedings under SARFAESI Act by
respondent is a matter of record.
3. Relief claimed in this writ petition is qua Private Non Banking
Financial Company. Learned counsel for respondent while submitting that
apart from the fact that present writ petition is not entertainable in view of
judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Phoenix ARC Private Limited
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:010618-DB
CWP-25962-2022(O&M) -2- 2024:PHHC:010618-DB
vs. Vishwa Bharati Vidya Mandir and others, 2022 (1) R.C.R. (Civil) 888
it has otherwise been rendered infructuous as petitioners did not deposit
amount in terms of order dated 11.04.2023. Consequently, possession of
property has since been taken.
4. Learned counsel for petitioners does not deny taking over
possession of secured asset in question pursuant to non-deposit of amount
in terms of order dated 11.04.2023 passed in this writ petition. In respect to
any other subsisting grievance petitioners admittedly have efficacious
remedies available to them with present writ petition not being
entertainable in terms of judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in
Phoenix ARC Private Limited (Supra).
5. Keeping in view facts and circumstances of the matter, writ
petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioners to avail remedy(ies) as
may be available to them in accordance with law. There is no expression of
any opinion on merits of the matter.
6. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of
accordingly.
(LISA GILL) JUDGE
(AMARJOT BHATTI ) JUDGE 25.01.2024 Sunil Devi Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:010618-DB
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!