Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1226 P&H
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:007128
2024:PHHC:007128
107 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
ESA-40-2017 (O&M)
Date of decision: 19.01.2024
Lakhbir Kaur
....Appellant
Versus
Bijender Pal
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present:- Mr.Vaibhav Jain, Advocate for the appellant
Mr. Kulbhushan Sharma, Advocate for the respondent
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J (Oral)
1. This Execution Second Appeal has been filed by the
appellant, who had filed objection petition in an execution petition.
The Executing Court dismissed the objection petition, which in
appeal, has been affirmed by the First Appellate Court.
2. In order to comprehend the issue involved in the present
case, some relevant facts, in brief, are required to be noticed.
3. The appellant herein claims to be wife of Sh.Swaran
Singh. In a judgment and decree dated 24.07.2015, Sh.Swaran Singh
was declared to be the owner of the property. He sold the property in
favour of Sh.Bijender Pal, the decree holder vide sale deed dated
28.08.2014. Subsequently, Sh.Bijender Pal filed a suit for grant of
mandatory and permanent injunction against Sh.Swaran Singh,
Smt.Harbhajan Kaur and Sh.Gurinder Singh. The aforesaid suit
culminated into an award passed by the Lok Adalat on 21.05.2016. In
view of the aforesaid award, Sh.Swaran Singh undertook to vacate
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:007128
ESA-40-2017 (O&M) 2 2024:PHHC:007128
and handover possession of the premises to Sh. Bijender Pal. The
appellant namely Smt.Lakhbir Kaur filed an appeal to challenge the
correctness of the award passed by the Lok Adalat. The aforesaid
appeal was dismissed by a detailed order passed on 15.07.2017.
4. Learned counsel representing the appellant contends that
third party objections have been decided without framing issues in
this case. He submits that the Executing Court has erred in dismissing
the objection petition in a summary manner.
5. This Court has considered the submissions made by the
learned counsel representing the parties.
6. As is evident, the appellant had already filed an appeal
against the award passed by the Lok Adalat, which has been
dismissed, on merits. The aforesaid judgment thus becomes final.
Moreover, vide judgment and decree dated 24.07.2015, Sh.Swaran
Singh was declared to be owner of the property.
6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, no ground to
interfere is made out.
7. Hence, dismissed.
8. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are
also disposed of.
19.01.2024 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) rekha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:007128
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!