Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 14841 P&H
Judgement Date : 1 September, 2023
CRM-M No.40118 of 2023 (O&M) 2023:PHHC:114585
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
210
CRM-M No.40118 of 2023 (O&M)
DATE OF DECISION: 01st SEPTEMBER, 2023
Ishwar Chand
.... Petitioner
Versus
State through Union Territory, Chandigarh
.... Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJBIR SEHRAWAT
Present : Ms. Sumanjit Kaur, Advocate and
Mr. Arshdeep Singh Cheema, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Ms. Vasundhara Dalal Anand, Addl. P.P. for U.T.
Chandigarh.
****
RAJBIR SEHRAWAT, J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under
Section 439 Cr.P.C for grant of bail pending trial in case FIR No.385
dated 13.12.2019 registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B
IPC (Section 201 IPC added lateron), at Police Station Central Sector-17,
U.T. Chandigarh.
2. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the case
against the petitioner is totally concocted and fabricated. The petitioner is
not involved in the crime at all. Even as per the story of the prosecution,
petitioner is alleged to have issued fake bills in lieu of 5% commission of
GST refunds claimed by the various traders through these bills. The
petitioner is not alleged to have got any benefit directly from the GST SANDEEP GROVER 2023.09.01 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. -1-
CRM-M No.40118 of 2023 (O&M) 2023:PHHC:114585
department or any other government department in the transactions.
Petitioner is in custody since 03.12.2022 and he is not required for any
further investigation. Hence, the petitioner deserves to be released on bail
pending trial.
3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the UT, Chandigarh,
being instructed by Inspector Shiv Charan, submits that the petitioner is
involved in a heinous crime. She further submits that petitioner is part of
the group of the fraudsters, who managed to grab a huge amount on
account of GST refunds. It is further submitted by the counsel that the
petitioner is involved in one more case of similar nature. However, it is
not disputed that the petitioner is in custody since 03.12.2022 and that the
petitioner is not required for any further investigation.
4. In view the above, but without expressing any further
opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed. The
petitioner is ordered to be released on bail pending trial subject to his
furnishing bail bonds/surety to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Duty
Magistrate, concerned.
01st SEPTEMBER, 2023 (RAJBIR SEHRAWAT)
'sandeep' JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes No
Whether Reportable: Yes No
SANDEEP GROVER
2023.09.01 14:58
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this order/judgment. -2-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!