Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 14824 P&H
Judgement Date : 1 September, 2023
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:114778
Neutral Citation Number 2023:PHHC:114778
Page No. -:1:-
Case Number CR-2484-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CR-2484-2023
Date of Decision:-01.09.2023
VINOD KUMAR ALIAS RAJU
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
GURBACHAN KAUR SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS
... Respondent(s)
-.-
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH
-.-
Present:- Mr. Vaibhav Sehgal, Advocate
for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Swarn Singh Tiwana, Advocate
for the respondent.
-.-
KARAMJIT SINGH, J. (Oral)
1. As per the report submitted by the trial Court in compliance of
previous order, initially the application filed under Order 9 Rule 13
CPC filed by the petitioner was allowed and ex-parte judgment and
decree dated 3.6.2011 was set aside vide order dated 1.11.2016. But
later on, keeping in view the conduct of the petitioner, the Court
concerned passed order to consign the main file and file of application
for setting aside ex-parte judgment and decree dated 3.6.2011
separately, meaning-thereby that the order dated 1.11.2016 was
automatically set aside and judgment and decree dated 3.6.2011 stood
restored.
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:114778
Neutral Citation Number 2023:PHHC:114778
Case Number CR-2484-2023
2. On query being put to the counsel for the petitioner, he submits that
order dated 1.11.2016 was subject to payment of cost and cost was
also deposited and after the setting aside of aforesaid judgment and
decree, the trial Court adjourned the case for filing written statement
on behalf of the respondent as is evident from dated 6.11.2016
(Annexure P-5).
3. It is amply clear that order dated 1.11.2016 has attained finality and as
such the ex-parte judgment dated 3.6.2011 is no more in existence.
This fact has not been disputed even by the counsel appearing for the
respondents.
4. It being so, the impugned orders (Annexures P-6 and P-8) passed by
the Executing Court based on aforesaid ex-parte judgment and decree
dated 3.6.2011 are totally illegal and are accordingly hereby set aside.
5. Consequently present civil revision petition is allowed and the
execution application, pending if any, on the basis of aforesaid ex-
parte judgment and decree dated 3.6.2011 also stands dismissed.
6. However taking into consideration the fact that the civil suit was filed
in the year 2008, the trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and to
dispose of the suit preferably within a period of next 8 months.
( KARAMJIT SINGH)
01.09.2023 JUDGE
Gaurav Sorot
Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No
Whether reportable? Yes / No
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:114778
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!