Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 20080 P&H
Judgement Date : 20 November, 2023
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:146952
Neutral Citation No.2023:PHHC:146952
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
122
CWP-25996-2023 (O&M)
Decided on : 20.11.2023
Hawa Singh . . .Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another . . . Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
PRESENT: Mr. Sunil Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Pankaj Middha, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
****
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral)
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents-
department has declined the benefit of increment to the petitioner on the basis
of the instructions dated 03.04.2019 (Annexure P-4), despite the fact that the
petitioner had rendered 12 months service before he retired.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view
the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal
No.2471 of 2023 titled as 'The Director (Admn. And HR) KPTCL and
others v. C. P. Mundinamani and others' , decided on 11.04.2023,
respondents are under obligation to consider the claim of the petitioner once
again.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that after the
judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in C. P.
Mundinamani'case (Supra), the petitioner has already submitted a legal
notice dated 28.06.2023 (Annexure P-6) but the same is still pending
consideration with the respondents and the petitioners will be satisfied, at this
stage, in case a direction is issued to the respondents to decide the same by
passing an appropriate speaking order in a time bound manner.
3. Notice of motion.
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:146952
CWP-25996-2023 (O&M) -2- 2023:PHHC: 146952
4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Pankaj Middha, Additional
Advocate General, Haryana., who is present in Court, accepts notice on
behalf of the respondent-State and submits that in case, the Legal Notice
dated 28.06.2023 (Annexure P-6) has been received in the office of the
concerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the
authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority
keeping in view the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in
C. P. Mundinamani'case (Supra), within a period of eight weeks of the
receipt of certified copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking
order and in case, after the decision, the petitioners are found entitled for any
benefit, the same will be extended to them within a further period of four
weeks.
5. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioners submits that keeping
in view the statement of learned State counsel, the present petition may
kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further.
6. Ordered accordingly.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI)
JUDGE
20.11.2023
Riya
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:146952
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!