Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 19981 P&H
Judgement Date : 17 November, 2023
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:146226-DB
2023:PHHC:146226-DB
LPA-683-2023 ( O&M ) -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
LPA-683-2023 ( O&M )
Date of decision : 17.11.2023
State of Haryana and others .......Appellants
Versus
Sheela Devi ....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana.
Mr. R.K. Doon, Advocate, for the caveator - respondent.
****
RITU BAHRI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ( Oral )
CM-1782-LPA-2023
For the reasons mentioned in the application, duly supported
by an affidavit, delay of 154 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
Application is, accordingly, allowed.
LPA-683-2023 ( O&M )
The State of Haryana and others have filed this appeal
against the order and judgment dated 16.11.2022 passed by the learned
Single Bench, whereby the petition (CWP-23820-2011) filed by the
respondent was allowed; and the order dated 18.11.2008 (Annexure P-7)
passed by appellant No.2 (respondent No.2 in the petition) vide which the
earlier order dated 23/29.12.2006 (Annexure P-3) granting monthly
financial assistance to the respondent (petitioner in the petition) in
accordance with the Haryana Compassionate Assistance to the
Dependents of deceased Govt. Employees Rules, 2006 (for short, "2006
Rules"), was withdrawn, has been quashed.
2. After going through the impugned order and judgment, it
transpires that vide order dated 23/29.12.2006 (Annexure P-3), the
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:146226-DB
2023:PHHC:146226-DB
LPA-683-2023 ( O&M ) -2-
respondent was rightly granted the benefit under the 2006 Rules. Learned
Single Judge has referred to Clause 6 of the 2006 Rules, whereby it has
been clarified that all pending cases of ex-gratia assistance are to be
covered under these Rules. In the case of the respondent herein, her
husband died in harness on 28.07.2005 and benefit of monthly financial
assistance was granted to her vide order dated 23/29.12.2006 (Annexure
P-3). Since this benefit was given to the respondent after coming into
force of the 2006 Rules, the writ petition filed by her has been rightly
allowed, while quashing the order dated 18.11.2008 (Annexure P-7)
withdrawing the said benefit.
3. In view of the above, no interference with the impugned
order and judgment passed by the learned Single Bench is called for.
4. Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
5. The impugned order and judgment dated 16.11.2022 passed
by the learned Single Bench be complied with within a period of two
weeks.
6. Since the main appeal itself has been dismissed, no orders
are required to be passed on the pending applications.
( RITU BAHRI ) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE November 17, 2023 ndj
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:146226-DB
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!