Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sukhwinder Singh And Anr vs State Of Punjab And Anr
2023 Latest Caselaw 19697 P&H

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 19697 P&H
Judgement Date : 14 November, 2023

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Sukhwinder Singh And Anr vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 14 November, 2023
                                                    Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:143964




                                                           2023:PHHC:143964

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                    AT CHANDIGARH

120                              CRM-M-45336-2023
                                 Date of Decision : November 14, 2023

SUKHWINDER SINGH AND ANR                              -Petitioners

                                         V/S

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR                               -Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI

Present:     Mr. Shoryaveer Vashist, Advocate
             for the petitioners.

             Mr. Karunesh Kaushal, A.A.G, Punjab.

                                ***

KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)

1. Through the instant petition, as instituted under Section 482

of the Cr.P.C., the petitioners yearn for quashing of the orders dated

12.04.2023 (Annexure P-4) and 05.07.2023 (Annexure P-5), as passed

respectively by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Balachaur and by

the learned Sessions Judge, S.B.S. Nagar.

2. At the very outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner

submits that the learned Magistrate concerned, through an order made on

12.04.2023 (Annexure P-4), after recalling her earlier order dated

31.03.2023, whereby, the complaint bearing CIS No.COMI/53/2016 was

ordered to be dismissed in default for want of prosecution, allowed

restoration of the complaint (supra) to its original number. However, once

the complaint (supra) was dismissed for non-prosecution, the learned

Magistrate concerned became functus officio and had no authority to

recall her earlier order. To fortify his above made submission, he has

1 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:143964

CRM-M-45336-2023 2 2023:PHHC:143964

placed reliance upon a judgment rendered by this Court in case titled

"Krishan Lal V/s Sangeeta Aggarwal", Crl. Misc. No.M-79076 of 2006,

Decided on: 06.05.2009, wherein, it has been held that the Code of

Criminal Procedure does not endow any statutory authority in the learned

Magistrate concerned to review/recall her own order, except if it suffers

from any clerical or arithmetical error. To further strengthen his above

made submission, he has also placed reliance upon a judgment rendered

by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Major General A.S. Gauraya V/s S.N.

Thakur", Criminal Appeal No.184 of 1979, Decided on : 25.04.1986.

3. With the able assistance of the learned counsel for the

petitioner, I have made a thorough survey of the orders (supra), as

impugned before this Court.

4. It is indisputable that a Magistrate does not have any able

statutory authority or jurisdiction to recall his/her own order, therefore,

the impugned order (Annexure P-4), as passed by the learned Magistrate

concerned, is per se illegal. However, the learned revisional court

concerned took cognizance of this fact and drew the order dated

05.07.2023 (Annexure P-5), thereby declaring the order (Annexure P-4) to

be non est. Moreover, through order (Annexure P-5), the learned

revisional Court concerned, after summoning the relevant record from the

court of learned Magistrate concerned and finding the order dated

31.03.2023, whereby, the complaint (supra) was ordered to be dismissed

in default for want of prosecution, to be replete with manifest error of law,

observed that once the charges had been framed, there was no statutory

jurisdiction vested in the learned Magistrate concerned to dismiss the

2 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:143964

CRM-M-45336-2023 3 2023:PHHC:143964

complaint (supra) merely for non-prosecution, especially when it was a

warrant case. Consequently, with the above observations, the learned

revisional Court concerned, rectified the error committed by the learned

Magistrate concerned and also set aside the order dated 31.03.2023,

whereby, complaint (supra) was dismissed for non-prosecution.

5. As a consequence of hereinabove discussed material, this

Court does not find any apparent error or perversity in the order dated

05.07.2023 (Annexure P-5), as passed by the learned revisional Court

concerned. Therefore, the instant petition is dismissed being devoid of

merits and the impugned order (Annexure P-5) is affirmed and

maintained.





                                    (KULDEEP TIWARI)
November 14, 2023                       JUDGE
devinder
          Whether speaking/reasoned :   Yes/No
          Whether Reportable        :   Yes/No




                                                     Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:143964

                                 3 of 3

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter