Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 19032 P&H
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2023
CRWP-10323-2023 -1- 2023:PHHC: 140452
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
259 CRWP-10323-2023
Date of decision: 03.11.2023
KAILASH RANI AND ANOTHER
.... PETITIONERS
V/S
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
...RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present: Mr. Parvesh Sachdeva, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, AAG, Punjab.
****
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral)
1. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this is the first
marriage between the petitioners.
2. The petitioners have prayed for the issuance of necessary directions
to the official respondents for protecting their civil/personal rights and liberties
from being invaded by the private respondents. The petitioner No.1-Kailash Rani
is stated to be major as according to the Aadhar Card (Annexure P-1), her exact
date of birth is 10.02.2005 whereas the petitioner No.2-Prince Kumar is stated to
be minor as according to the Aadhar Card (Annexure P-2), his exact date of birth
is 21.11.2002. The petitioners are alleged to have solemnized marriage on
04.10.2023 (Annexure P-3). They feel reasonable apprehension and a threat
perception at the hands of the private respondents and pray that their
personal/civil rights be not violated by them.
KUSUM 2023.11.06 12:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD
3. Precisely, in the context of the aforesaid relief, the petitioners have
approached the Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka, District
Fazilka-respondent No.2 by way of a representation dated 12.10.2023
(Annexure P-5).
4. Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, AAG, Punjab has put in appearance on
behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3.
5. At this stage, without expressing any opinion as to the validity of the
marriage and majority of the petitioners, it would be just and appropriate to direct
respondent No.2 to look into the grievance of the petitioners and pass an
appropriate order on merits in accordance with law. Respondent No.2 would pass
necessary order without being influenced by any pleadings made in the petition.
It would be appreciated if the needful is done within a period of one month from
the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
6. However, it is made clear that this order shall not debar the official
respondents from proceeding against any of the parties, if they are involved in
any other case.
7. The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
( JASJIT SINGH BEDI )
JUDGE
November 03, 2023
Kusum
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
KUSUM
2023.11.06 12:04
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this order/judgment
Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!